Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 28, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3219, Edson Spencer, Continued) <br />Ordway stated originally these two lots were separated and were combined by Mr. Spencer and that <br />Mr. Spencer is now requesting the two lots be split again. <br />Murphy stated approval of the plat does not require a iecision on the road. <br />Turner stated the resolution before the Council says 1 <br />would need to be modified if the Council approves a <br />Gaffron stated this is a preliminary plat resolution and <br />required to widen the roadway to 20 feet, that languag <br />resolution would be before the Council once the applic <br />Murphy moved, Peterson seconded, Application <br />to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5500, a Resolution <br />subdivision for property located at 1135 Spring <br />Sansevere indicated he would be opposed to that n <br />increase the width of the roadway at some point in <br />is. <br />Grant noted the roadway is approximately <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Sansevere Opposed. <br />12. #06 -3220 JULE AND ELIZABETH <br />VARIANCE <br />Jule and Elizabeth Hannaford, Applicants, were <br />Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to remove <br />will be 4.5 feet closer to the lake, have a lower profil <br />functional for the property owners. A new rear (strei <br />the two -foot wide concrete path within 75 feet of the <br />hardcover on the property. <br />The Planning Commission voted 5 -0 to recommend <br />allow reconstruction of a new deck within the footp: <br />remove all of the hardcover elements as initially prc <br />existing roadway shall be widened to 20 feet and <br />3th other than the 20 feet. <br />ecommended that if the property owners are not <br />should be deleted. Gaffron noted another <br />.nts request final plat approval. <br />-3219, Edson Spencer, 1135 Spring Hill Road, <br />nting preliminary approval of a Class II <br />Road, with the roadway being left at 17 feet. <br />m since it does not require the property owners to <br />future. Sansevere inquired how long the driveway <br />of a mile in length. <br />1220 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD — <br />e existing deck and construct a new deck which <br />when viewed form the lake, and become more <br />) stoop is also proposed. As part of this application, <br />uke will be removed as well as other miscellaneous <br />iroval of hardcover and lake setback variances to <br />of the existing deck provided the applicants <br />PAGE 13 <br />