Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />J <br />ORONO CITY C <br />Monday, E <br />7:00 o' <br />( #05 -3076 Grading Plan Review —1280 Spruce PI <br />retaining walls and steps were torn out, with the <br />the two retaining walls were removed, the two bE <br />new retaining walls and dirt was hauled in. Gust <br />excessive dirt to fill in an area that was used as a <br />Murphy stated all the changes discussed tonight <br />Gregory Gustafson stated the original approval requ <br />0 -75 foot zone, which was done, and the area was fi <br />the City's requirement was to fill in the area next to <br />retaining wall. <br />McMillan inquired whether the house would be too <br />Gregory Gustafson stated it would not be. Gustafsi <br />the house because 60 percent of the foundation of t <br />that helped to create a very unnatural looking area, <br />require a retaining wall. Gustafson stated the City' <br />the rest of the lot. Gustafson noted he was in Florii <br />McMillan inquired whether someone is allowed to <br />Curtis stated Staff has recently clarified the interpre <br />against a house in an effort to create a third story is <br />depicting the slope against the house would have w <br />addition, the retaining wall on the walkout side waE <br />worked. <br />McMillan stated both of the retaining walls look <br />provide more lighting for the walkout level. <br />White inquired how the hardcover could be <br />Chris indicated the driveway could be reduced. <br />Jeffrey Gustafson stated he could reduce the dri <br />White stated the Council cannot allow contractors <br />through the proper process. <br />OF THE <br />INCIL MEETING <br />rust 14, 206 <br />ck p.m. <br />Continued) <br />-over in the 0 -75 foot zone being removed. Once <br />had to be sloped in order to eliminate the need for <br />n stated they did not feel they were hauling in <br />ip by the previous owner. <br />not in the original approval. <br />all of the structure to be removed within the <br />in to slope down to the lake. Gustafson stated <br />house and that he would prefer not to have a <br />if the fill were removed. <br />i stated the City required that fill be added against <br />house had to have dirt against it. Gustafson stated <br />id he was told that the area was too steep and would <br />requirement created a berm that does not fit in with <br />i at the time the work was completed. <br />create by using fill a walkout level. <br />:ation of the code and that artificial fill placed <br />io longer allowed. Curtis indicated the original plan <br />irked and was reviewed by the City Engineer. In <br />shown on the original approval and would have also <br />they were designed to accommodate a window and <br />to 630 square feet. <br />change the plans that were approved without going <br />Murphy requested the building inspector provide his insight on the situation. <br />• 1 <br />PAGE 5 <br />