My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
08-14-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:35:36 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:35:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 14, 206 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3212 Hempel Properties, Continued) <br />McMillan inquired how much additional parking would be required if a second story were added. <br />Wrede stated 62.5 stalls would be required. <br />White inquired what type of retail the developer is considering for this site. <br />Kerznack stated they have a hair salon and a dry-'cleaner and a sandwich shop that have expressed <br />interest. <br />Gaffron expressed a concern regarding the orientation of the office building and the windows. Gaffron <br />stated one of the goals is to lessen bright lights toward the northwest and that screening would be <br />critical. Gaffron indicated he likes the orientation of the retail building and recommended that the <br />majority of the parking be located away from the residential side. <br />Gaffron indicated he does not see parking as an issue given the proposed uses, but recommended <br />limiting the amount of office space that could be converted to retail in the future. <br />• <br />White stated he prefers the office concept rather than a 24 -hour pharmacy for this site and that he would • <br />like to see long -term tenants. White suggested some trees be incorporated in the plan rather than the <br />ponding. White recommended high - efficiency lighting also be incorporated in the plans. <br />Gaffron suggested the Council discuss the concerns raised by the neighbors at the Planning Commission <br />meeting. Gaffron stated he is unsure whether the neighbors have seen the latest revisions but that the <br />comments expressed by the neighbors at the Planning Commission meeting indicated they thought there <br />would be a different type of development for this site than what is being proposed. <br />Moorse indicated he also prefers office space rather than retail space. Moorse expressed concern that <br />there would be a larger turnover of tenants in the retail space and questioned whether the retail portion is <br />necessary. <br />Kerznack stated the office tenants like to have a sandwich shop and other similar service- oriented <br />businesses close by and that the retail is a good compliment to the office component. Kerznack <br />expressed a concern increasing the medical component. <br />Zeming stated it is possible to increase the medical component but that the strategy is to create a <br />neighborhood center that includes medical and retail because they interact with each other. Studies have <br />shown over the years that people who visit the medical facilities also do some retail shopping at the <br />same time and that the two uses compliment each other. <br />McMillan stated one of the constraints to the lot is the right- in/right -out and locating the buildings in <br />relation to that access. McMillan commented in her view the retail portion has not been well thought <br />out. <br />PAGE 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.