Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 14, 206 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3208 Ryan Companies, Continued) <br />Gaffron recommended that prior to completion of the approval process, access to Western Steel should <br />be clearly delineated. Gaffron noted that access for Western Steel would have to be provided through <br />the Ryan site. <br />Nordland expressed a concern that their approval is'being tied to granting easements for roads that do <br />not currently exist and that they are dealing with circumstances that could change in the future. <br />Gaffron reiterated that access to the Western Steel site should be clearly spelled out prior to final <br />approval being granted. <br />Murphy inquired whether Building A would ever be sold off. <br />Nordland stated there could be a scenario where Building A is sold off but their general intention is to <br />lease the building and complete the improvements prior to any sale. <br />Gaffron stated by the same argument that the City is requiring a right -of -way across the Ryan property, <br />the City is also suggesting that access needs to be provided to the other industrial park property as part <br />of the platting process. Gaffron stated in his opinion that future access should be dealt with as part of <br />this process. <br />Nordland questioned who would build it and maintain it and that there are a number of logistics, which <br />are unknown at this time, that are involved in negotiating that type of agreement. Nordland expressed <br />surprise that this issue was not discussed earlier. I <br />Gaffron stated from the start the City has stated th <br />shared with Western Steel. Gaffron stated it is ree <br />Companies to provide that access sometime in the <br />Nordland stated they have attempted to accommo <br />requirement to construct additional roads through <br />would need to be a right - in/right -out that would be <br />cable for the City to require a commitment by Ryan <br />all the requests made of them but that the <br />property is an unfair burden. <br />Gaffron stated it would not be reasonable for the City to approve a site plan for this property that does <br />not accommodate the future access needs of the Western Steel site. Gaffron stated if this issue is not <br />dealt with now, it would be more difficult to deal with it later. <br />McMillan stated one of the improvements on High, <br />location which would create a right - in/right -out. <br />White stated there is no disagreement that the <br />Gaffron pointed out Western Steel's property is <br />option of providing access through Morrie's Au <br />12 is the construction of the median at that <br />would be a public roadway. <br />close to that road. Gaffron stated there is also the <br />otive but at this time Morrie's Automotive is not <br />PAGE 17 <br />