Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 14,206 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3201 David Carlson, Continued) <br />Carlson stated he would like to have that flexibility with that unit. <br />Murphy commented he does not want to see the remaining buildings changed from what was originally <br />proposed. <br />Moorse inquired whether the Council would like to see a limit put on the pitch of the roof. <br />Murphy stated he does not have a problem with an occasional dormer but that he does not want to see <br />the pitch of the roof increased on the other units. Murphy inquired whether the language in the <br />comprehensive plan amendment should address the pitch of the roof. <br />Gaffron stated since this is a residential planned unit development, the Council would have another <br />opportunity to review the plans. <br />Murphy inquired whether the applicant is clear on the direction of the Council. <br />Carlson stated he is. Carlson commented that it appears it is going to take longer to go through the <br />approval process than what was originally -contemplated and inquired whether approval could be • <br />contingent upon Metropolitan Council approval. <br />Gaffron stated in his opinion he would like to have the approval of the Metropolitan Council prior to <br />proceeding any further on the application because the Metropolitan Council could attach certain <br />conditions to the approval that the City does not anticipate. <br />McMillan inquired whether the language on page three relating to the number of stories would be <br />changed then. <br />Gaffron stated in his opinion that language does not need to be changed and that the Council would have <br />other opportunities to refine that language as the application goes through the approval process. <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, Application #06 -06 -3201, David Carlson of Wilson <br />Management for Charlie Thompson, 875 Wayzata Boulevard West, to conditionally approve the <br />2000 -2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment #3 subject to Metropolitan Council review and <br />approval, and to direct staff to submit the amendment to Metropolitan Council. VOTE: Ayes 3, <br />Nays 0. <br />Gaffron noted this application would appear before the Planning Commission at their August meeting. <br />Jamnik noted that a four - fifths vote is required to approve the comprehensive plan amendment. <br />Gaffron stated this item would then need to come back before the Council in two weeks. <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to reconsider the above motion. <br />PAGE 12 <br />