My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
07-10-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:34:10 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:34:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 10, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3196 McNAUGHTON /HAMM, CONTINUED) <br />Peterson connnented she is leaning more in favor of approving this application since allowing the lot line <br />rearrangement would eliminate that little strip of land. <br />Sansevere stated the proposed lot is also not out of character with the neighborhood. <br />Peterson stated she also had the same question for Mrs. Goetten concerning the rationale for opposing this <br />application and that in her mind this is a better solution than what was proposed back in the early 1990s. <br />Peterson commented she does have some concerns regarding the access and inquired whether there is a <br />reasonable solution to the access situation. <br />Gaffron stated the current access point that has been proposed to develop the lot was created in <br />conjunction with a parking area. Gaffron stated a letter received from Hennepin County indicates that <br />they have known for decades that some day access would have to be provided to this lot somewhere along <br />County Road 15 and that they are in favor of the proposed access point. - Gaffron stated the proposed . <br />access does not meet the City's standard for distance from an intersection but it is the best location that <br />exists. <br />White inquired how big the proposed residence is. <br />McNaughton indicated the footprint with the garage is around 3800 square feet and that it is within the <br />City's hardcover requirements. 0 <br />White inquired how big the house could be if the outlot was not combined. <br />Gaffron stated the house would need to be smaller. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the applicant intends to reside on this lot. <br />McNaughton stated it is his intent to live there, with the purchase agreement being contingent upon the <br />approval of the lot line rearrangement. McNaughton stated since the last meeting, he did speak with the <br />neighbors and answer their questions and that he has also recently sent a letter to each of the neighbors <br />stating that he would not remove any trees until the building process began. McNaughton commented he <br />is sympathetic to the concerns of the neighbors and is also in favor of some berining and trees along <br />County Road 15. <br />McMillan stated there are two reasons why she would like to see this outlot combined with one of the <br />neighboring properties, and one deals with safety. McMillan stated the traffic on County Road 15 has <br />increased significantly over the years and that the driveway onto Orono Lane is a safer access than access <br />off of County Road 15. McMillan stated the only other spot for a driveway would be down by the <br />lakeshore, which is not the best solution due to the hardcover and the headlights that would flash out onto <br />the lake. McMillan stated in her opinion access off of Orono Lane is the safer option. <br />• <br />PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.