My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
07-10-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:34:10 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:34:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 10, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(RYAN COMPANIES, CONTINUED) • <br />Nordland indicated Ryan Companies is willing to work with the City on the right -of -way and the other <br />issues and that they have designed buildings that attract good employers. <br />McMillan stated if the existing building is dictating what happens with the right -of -way, it would go to a <br />hardship. McMillan suggested some of the parking spaces on the north side of the new street be removed <br />and turned into green space until a need is demonstrated for more parking spaces. <br />Nordland stated they often have used that option whenever possible. <br />McMillan stated she would like to see more green space created wherever possible. <br />White commented Morrie's also has the same problem with having a 70 -foot right -of -way and that the <br />City should look at other options. <br />Murphy stated it is too early to decide whether a 50 -foot right -of -way is appropriate for this area. The <br />City has created standards for a reason and that the applicant should demonstrate more reasons for having <br />a 50 -foot right -of -way. <br />Sansevere stated there is a difference between commercial development and residential development. <br />Sansevere commented that residential development is held to strict standards and that homeowners are <br />required to demonstrate a hardship for a variance, which should also be the case with commercial <br />development. Sansevere stated the commercial developers should also have to demonstrate a legitimate • <br />hardship. <br />Nordland commented they could also do a private driveway into their property, which would not benefit <br />the adjoining property. <br />Murphy stated they are attempting to achieve some connectivity through the industrial park and that the <br />City should be clear about what it wants to see for this area. <br />McMillan stated one option is that a portion of the existing building could be removed. <br />White requested the Council discuss the landscaping in the northeast corner. <br />McMillan stated she would like to see additional landscaping in that area. <br />Nordland stated as the parking lot is expanded, they would be amenable to adding more landscaping in <br />that area. Nordland stated they would like to avoid planting trees only to have to remove them later when <br />the parking lot is reconstructed. <br />White inquired when the 70 -foot roadway width standard was established. <br />Gaffron stated the 70 -foot roadway was established in the 1970s. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this application. <br />PAGE 24 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.