Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CIT. � COUNCIL MEETING <br />Mondly, July 10, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3201 CHARLIE THOMPSON, <br />Carlson stated there would be 1.4 units per dry acre and would be under one unit per acre if the total <br />acreage is included. <br />Gaffron commented the density would roughly be the equivalent of a three - quarter acre lot and would be <br />consistent with some of the other developments approved. <br />Gaffron questioned how close the setback to the <br />this plan tonight. <br />Murphy stated house number nine appears to be <br />not an issue in his mind. <br />White commented the developer has done a <br />and buffers being proposed. <br />Sansevere inquired why house number nine is <br />depicted in the old plans. <br />Johnston stated they were required to angle <br />McMillan stated in her view this is a more <br />better. <br />Line should be. Gaffron noted he has only seen <br />closer to the Luce Line than his house and that it is <br />job with his proposal and that he likes the lower density <br />parallel with the Luce Line rather than angled as <br />number nine in order to fit it in on the first plans. <br />product than the original proposal and fits the site , <br />McMillan stated her concern relates to the language in the comprehensive plan and how to best reflect <br />this change in density. McMillan stated she would like to retain the 1.5 density and floor area ratio being <br />proposed tonight. <br />Gaffion stated in the agreement regarding Outlot A of Stonebay, certain parameters and performance <br />standards were specified, which could be done m this situation. <br />Murphy noted the entrance off of Highway 12 is <br />Murphy inquired whether the current access con . <br />Johnston indicated it would be. <br />Gaffion recommended Council direct staff to <br />consideration by the Council at its August me <br />application. <br />being discussed and is not resolved at this point. <br />ation would be utilized. <br />comprehensive plan amendment language for <br />and to either give conceptual approval or table the <br />Johnston requested the council take some formal Iaction approving this plan and type of use for the site, <br />which would allow them to proceed forward witk, the process. Johnston stated they would like to begin <br />construction this year. I <br />PAGE 13 <br />