My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
06-26-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:32:55 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:32:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TiEIE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 26, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />a <br />(3. JAMESTOWNROAD SANITARYSEWER PROJECT ASSESSMENT HEARING, • <br />Continued) <br />Moorse noted a property owner with a conforming septic system may also elect to request exclusion from <br />the project assessment and the City will then finance the assessment debt service cost until the property <br />does connect to the sewer system. At the time a property that requested exclusion from the assessment <br />wants to connect to the sewer system, payment of the fiill current sewer connection fee is then required <br />before a sewer connection permit is issued. <br />McMillan inquired what happens if the property has an alternate septic site. <br />Moorse stated regardless if an alternate septic site exists on the property, once the current septic system <br />on the lot becomes nonconforming, that property would be required to connect to city sewer. <br />Mayor Peterson opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />The public hearing was closed at 7:08 p.m. <br />McMillan noted one property owner requested to be excluded from the project. <br />Moorse stated that property owner would be deleted from the assessment roll and would then pay the full <br />connection fee at the time the property is connected to the sanitary sewer. <br />McMillan inquired what state law requires be done with the old septic tanks. <br />Kellogg stated the tanks would have to be abandoned, which typically means that the top is removed and <br />the walls collapsed and the area filled with soil. Kellogg stated the costs to abandon the tank are not <br />included in the project costs but that the property owners were given an estimate on the anticipated costs <br />to complete that work. <br />Ben Young, 3105 County Road 6, inquired whether the grinder pump could be installed in the septic tank. <br />Kellogg stated the pump does not work in the septic tank. <br />a. ADOPT ASSESSMENT ROLL — RESOLUTION NO. 5478 <br />Sansevere moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5478, a Resolution adopting the <br />Jamestown Road Neighborhood Sanitary Sewer Improvements Assessment Roll. VOTE: Ayes 4, <br />Nays 0. <br />b. AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — RESOLUTION NO. 5479 <br />Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5479, a Resolution Awarding <br />the bid to Castrejon, Inc., in the amount of $74,921.50, for the Jamestown Road Sanitary Sewer <br />Project. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />• <br />PAGE 2of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.