Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />ORONO CITY CC <br />Monday, I <br />7:00 o'c <br />OF THE <br />NCIL MEETING <br />ie 12, 2006 <br />ck p.m. <br />(6. #06 -3196 PAT McNA UGHTOXIED WARD HAMM, 1391 FOX STREET, 1401 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />McNaughton stated Mr. Hamm has received all the <br />Gaffron stated Mr. Hamm still owns this parcel of <br />Moen expressed a concern that the City does not <br />property would be sold to Mr. McNaughton <br />McMillan stated the biggest advantage of combinin <br />the 1401 lot is a buildable lot because it was assess( <br />lot off of Orono Lane. McMillan inquired whether <br />Gaffron stated there was not an easement granted. <br />McMillan stated granting an easement after the fa <br />with outlots along the lake and that people in the <br />she is respectful of what the Council did in the 19 <br />combination and would probably vote in favor of <br />from the City concerning this application. <br />and has not made any transfer of land. <br />any firm documentation evidencing that this <br />these two lots is the safety issue. McMillan stated <br />for sewer and that there should be access to that <br />i easement was provided to the Hamm property. <br />can become messy and that she also has a concern <br />A have placed docks on outlots. McMillan stated <br />s but that she sees a lot of sense in the new <br />application. <br />White stated he is inclined to side with ex -mayor Callahan and that a larger house on the lake is <br />• detrimental to the lake. White stated he would like to see a plan prior to approving the combination <br />since there is no guarantee that any proposed house would appear before the Council. <br />• <br />Murphy indicated he concurs with the comments i <br />see a plan prior to approving the combination. M- <br />difference in how these lots were created and that <br />without a formal plan in front of them. <br />Murphy stated he is not surprised by the absence c <br />formal document evidencing that Mr. McNaughtoi <br />Murphy suggested McNaughton obtain ownership <br />Murphy stated he does have concerns with the sa: <br />the County to improve that interchange. Murphy <br />currently exists in that interchange remaining the: <br />Sansevere stated he agrees that there needs to be m <br />land to Mr. McNaughton. Sansevere commented tl <br />approvals by the City can be reversed or changed. <br />point someone is going to construct a house on that <br />the lots were combined. <br />Gaffron stated a smaller house would need to be <br />Murphy stated he is not going to make a decision <br />property. <br />Acting Mayor White and that he would also like to <br />)hy stated the history does not make much <br />has a concern about undoing the agreement <br />Mr. Hamm, but that he would like to see some <br />will be purchasing this property from Mr. Hamm. <br />o Lot 1 and then come back before the Council. <br />of that intersection and that the City has petitioned <br />-d he is not able to count on anything that <br />re documentation concerning the future sale of this <br />at nothing is written in stone and that previous <br />iansevere noted that lot is restricted but that at some <br />site. Sansevere inquired how big a home could be if <br />without Outlot A. <br />he sees evidence that Mr. McNaughton owns the <br />PAGE 9 of 9 <br />