Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 12, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. #06 -3196 PAT McNA UGHTOXIED WARD HAMM,1391 FOX STREET, 1401 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Murphy inquired whether McNaughton intends to purchase the Hamm property. <br />McNaughton stated it is his intent to purchase the Hamm property. <br />Murphy commented that there appears to be a number of issues with this application and inquired why it <br />is being labeled a lot line rearrangement. Murphy noted the lot lines would disappear if this application <br />is approved. <br />Gaffron stated the lots are essentially combined and the owner receives one tax statement for the <br />different lots. Gaffron commented this is considered a lot line rearrangement since these lots were <br />legally combined and the old lot line is being relocated. Gaffron stated this is also considered a plat <br />because it involves an outlot and the City's code does not allow an outlot to be used for anything other <br />than what it was originally designed for. In 1992, it was Staff's recommendation that Outlot A remain <br />separate and be designated for future acquisition by one of the adjacent property owners. <br />Gaffron stated by the time the plat was approved, the lot line had moved further west to allow for <br />greater flexibility for the garage and the Council approved a lot that was less than two acres. Gaffron <br />stated from Staff's perspective it was likely that there would be a house on this lot, noting that the lot <br />was assessed for city sewer and water and that it is bigger in size than some of the other lots in the area. <br />Gaffron stated in his view the density standards established in the comprehensive plan are met. <br />McMillan inquired whether some gravel has been added along with a dock on the outlot. <br />McNaughton stated there has never been a dock on the lot and that any work that has been completed on <br />the property has been done with the approval of the city. McNaughton commented he has attempted to <br />keep the lines of communication open with the neighbors and that they had the same opportunity to <br />purchase the property as he did. McNaughton stated the neighbors have enjoyed having a vacant lot <br />next to them for a number of years and that they are not very receptive to the change. McNaughton <br />noted he has had to deal with a fence that is located ten feet onto his property. <br />Sansevere stated the Council always likes the applicants to work with the neighbors and that the Council <br />does take into account the concerns raised by them. Sansevere commented he would like to hear from <br />the neighbors tonight but that it appears this might be a situation where the neighbors are simply <br />opposed to the construction of a house on this lot. <br />Kevin Kokesh, 1399 Orono Lane, stated he lives immediately adjacent to this lot and that his main issue <br />deals with the applicant's original plans to construct on Lot 1. Kokesh stated Outlot A was originally <br />intended to be the applicant's access to the lake. Kokesh stated the plans that were proposed previously <br />were not followed and that instead the applicant has clear -cut Outlot A. <br />Kokesh distributed pictures of the cutting to the Council. Kokesh stated the removal of the trees and the <br />excavation that has been done on this property has resulted in a dramatic change. Kokesh noted several <br />trees were cut in excess of the City's six -inch tree limit within 75 feet of the lake. Kokesh pointed out <br />County Road 15 is in this area and that the trees that were cut have now exposed County Road 15 to <br />their houses. is <br />PAGE 4 of 4 <br />