My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
05-08-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:30:26 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 8, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(4. #05 -3136 TROYBROITZMAN ,1860SHORELINEDRIVE, Continued) <br />Sansevere stated that he would not support the placement of a culvert across the Coward's <br />property, unless they wanted it. He indicated that, he too, would prefer the applicant return to the <br />original driveway but asked at this point if this could be mandated. <br />Gaffron stated that, while the County would prefer fewer curb cuts off the County road, the County <br />must recognize existing driveway cuts. <br />Planning Commissioner Kempf pointed out that, in an attempt to slow the impetus or divert water <br />from running off a long driveway to the lake, he would prefer it be directed thru a wetland. <br />Sansevere asked the Council to consider the width of the home and questioned whether it was still <br />too wide to fit all that the applicant was asking for. <br />Murphy stated that although the home meets all standards to which the City has, the Council has <br />discussed the side setbacks and average lakeshore setbacks. He repeated that, although it does not <br />violate anything, the Council had repeatedly urged the applicant to get the picture and create <br />something with his architect less than what is being proposed, which has not happened yet. Murphy <br />maintained that the City and applicant have been going through an awful lot of trouble to make this <br />all fit, including an intensive landscaping design. <br />While she appreciated the applicant's effort to rethink the landscaping and swale, Mayor Peterson • <br />stated that she was still having difficulty with the massing of the house. She indicated that she was <br />torn between the two driveway accesses and was hoping that the applicant would have tweaked the <br />plan before returning to Council. <br />Broitzman pointed out that the current home is actually wider than the one being proposed. <br />Steven Larson, of the Fox Hill Association, asked about the process which allows for an increase in <br />hardcover by 50 %. <br />Gaffron stated that the Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to discuss the lot <br />width requirements for non - conforming lot sizes which addresses the need for aggregate setbacks. <br />Larson pointed out that the Association felt that the additional runoff being proposed for their pond <br />may have a detrimental effect on the neighborhood and they would object to an increase in water <br />there. <br />Gaffron suggested that the City would need to determine whether the pond contained a closed basin <br />or not. <br />Mr. Coward questioned the landscaping plan which suggested arborvitae, a sun loving shrub, for <br />the rear shady side of the property. He maintained that there was no way to make this plan work in <br />this neighborhood even with the amount of engineering going on, and that it would have <br />detrimental impacts on the neighbors' property values. <br />• <br />PAGE 6 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.