My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
05-08-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:30:26 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:30:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 8, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(6. #06 -3185 WJMPROPERTIES, 2605 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br />from becoming a retail sales lot. In addition, the total storage on the site of `demonstration vehicles, <br />new vehicles, and finished vehicles ready for delivery to dealerships' would be limited to 320. <br />Gaffron indicated that the Planning Commission also concluded that the flagpoles would be limited <br />to a height of 25' based on the height of the building. Gaffron stated that staff recommends <br />approval of the building and parking expansions /relocation. Staff also recommends approval of the <br />proposed revised language regarding display and demonstration vehicles. Staff concurs with the <br />Planning Commission recommendation regarding the flagpole height limit. Finally, Gaffron <br />indicated that staff has not reviewed the on -site signage request for a 3'X12' sign on the site and <br />has no comments at this point. <br />Sansevere asked whether the body shop was a retail establishment and if the staff was willing to <br />work with individual buyers. <br />Peter Johnson, Attorney representing the Applicant, stated that if an individual wished to purchase <br />a vehicle, they would be directed to a dealership, rather than this connmercial site. He pointed out <br />that the proposed sign would be placed near the body shop to direct incoming customers. <br />Sansevere asked whether this proposal would be the last retail use on the site. <br />Johnson stated that he thought so for now, but pointed out that things change. • <br />Murphy voiced his concern that as this establishment evolves, it is moving towards a new and used <br />car lot outside the building. Although it is intended for fleet leasing and fleet sales, he questioned <br />what the difference was between that and individual leasing or sales. He did not wish to get into <br />semantics by confusing the language and using things interchangeably that do not work that way <br />and leave the City with a retail sales lot on the front of that building. <br />Johnson stated that this is a low volume body shop business in an industrial area with an enclosed <br />evaluation area inside. <br />Murphy suggested the Council take a tour of the facility as soon as possible to allay any fears <br />members might have. <br />White pointed out that the language in the original approvals guards against this becoming a used <br />car lot. <br />Johnson stated that his client had been told that the City can allow an intensification of the original <br />CUP. Johnson noted that Morrie's intends to be here a long time and to comply with the CUP. He <br />stated that it is in writing in the CUP that retail sales are not in the plan, for instance a dealership <br />cannot show various autos and makes on the same floor, but fleet agencies are allowed to show <br />together, which is what is proposed here with conunercial buyers coming to one location to choose <br />their companies' vehicles. <br />McMillan pointed out that this center operates as a distribution site for his dealerships as well, <br />adding the used car prep to the new car sale. 0 <br />PAGE 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.