My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
04-26-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:29:56 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:29:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />0 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 24, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. #05 -3136 TROYBROITZMAN,1860 <br />DRIVE, Continued) <br />though this is contrary to what they were hearing this evening. He objected to lights sweeping <br />across his home coming and going and urged council to require additional landscaping. <br />l <br />Morris Nelson, 1900 Shoreline Drive, stated that something needs to be designed that fits on the <br />property rather than being pushed off on the neighbors' lots. He believed something more <br />reasonable could be proposed, rather than trying to shoehorn something in that does not fit the size <br />or character of the lot and will adversely impact the values of all neighbors' properties. <br />Murphy asked what the long range plans were for the ancillary buildings in the back of the <br />properly. <br />Broitzman stated that he planned to remove the !old garage after construction and had no plans for <br />additional buildings at this time. . <br />Gaffron pointed out that the applicant would <br />an additional 1200 s.f. <br />White asked whether the applicant could be al <br />driveway which runs straight into the home ra <br />neighbors. <br />bly be allowed an accessory structure of up to <br />-d a deeper cut through the lot to create a <br />than sweeps across the lot causing impacts to the <br />Mayor Peterson stated that this structure does not fit the land, nor does the massing of the structure <br />fit on a narrow lot without adversely impacting all of the neighbors. <br />Sansevere commented that he would support a <br />driveway which would have less impact on nei <br />McMillan stated that the applicant has maxed e <br />straight up vertically. She maintained that she N <br />has asked for than expect the neighbors to give <br />wants. She stated that the neighbors should not <br />White suggested that if the applicant would <br />driveway would disappear. <br />Nelson pointed out that the applicant had a <br />removing the trees in front of his property. <br />Broitzman stated that he could work with ai <br />side to force drainage in a certain direction. <br />to allow the applicant to come straight in on a <br />ything out from setback to setback including <br />Id rather see him give up a bit of the space he <br />their rights in order for him to get what he <br />asked to carry the burden of his size. <br />iminate one garage stall, the whole need for the side <br />Sansevere reiterated that it is not the neighbors' <br />applicant must address the drainage on his own <br />Sansevere stated that he would not support usin <br />and again urged the applicant to adjust the wide. <br />removed a buffer to County Road 15 by <br />neighbor to ask them if he could add fill on their -- <br />responsibility to carry his burden. Either the <br />property or downsize the footprint of his home. <br />the neighbors to solve the applicant's problems <br />i of his footprint. <br />PAGE 5 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.