My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2006 Council Minutes Board of Appeal & Equalization
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
04-19-2006 Council Minutes Board of Appeal & Equalization
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:28:55 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:28:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
14 <br />MINUTES OF THE. <br />ORONO BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION <br />Wednesday, April 19, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />Ericson stated he has 125 feet of lakeshore property. Erickson stated he has two lots listed on one tax <br />statement and that the City would not allow him to construct a new residence on the 65 -foot lot a few <br />years ago. <br />Ericson reiterated--that-an increase of $103,000 in one year is too much and that he will not be able to <br />live there once he retires. <br />Davy indicated they did visit the Ericson property last year and that the market valuation was carried <br />forward from last year. <br />Murphy inquired whether Mr. Ericson took his case through the appeal process last year. <br />Ericson indicated he did not. Ericson stated the aerial photograph that was displayed last year shows <br />that his neighbor's house is located on his property. <br />Murphy indicated that he also experienced a similar increase and that the city is in a difficult situation <br />with property valuations. Murphy stated this is the first time in about three years that the average <br />increase is less than 10 percent throughout the city. Murphy stated the hot real estate market is driving <br />these increases. <br />Ericson stated no matter what the valuation is, people have to be able to live in a house, and that based <br />on the overall valuation of the city, the board has some leeway to reduce his valuation somewhat. <br />McMillan stated they cannot reduce it by more than one percent of the total'assessed value. • <br />White inquired why Mr. Ericson's valuation came in higher than the average. <br />Davy stated the valuations vary around the lake, with some valuations going up 17 or 18 percent and <br />others only going up 5 or 6 percent. <br />Ericson stated the problem along Shadywood Road is that people are buying up houses and then tearing <br />them down and constructing million dollar homes. <br />Murphy noted that there is a lot available on Bohn's Point for $3.5 million without a house. <br />Ericson stated in his opinion he is being penalized because the City told him approximately 15 years ago <br />that he could not build a home on that adjoining lot. <br />White commented he does not like the system because some people are getting taxed out of their homes. <br />White stated he does not see a way to get around the process that the City is required to go through in <br />determining valuations. <br />Peterson stated the county assessor has provided some numbers for neighboring communities, with <br />Deephaven being at a 16 percent overall average and Excelsior is over 30 percent. <br />Davy stated the City of Orono has been more current in their increases than some of the other cities and <br />that most property owners do not experience a huge increase. • <br />PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.