My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
03-27-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:27:28 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:27:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 27, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(5. #05 -312 NARROWS SALOON, 3382 SHORELINE DRIVE —CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT — RESOL UTIONNO. 5440 = CONTINUED) <br />McMillan concurred, voicing her concern that if the patio is too large and people choose to hang <br />out there, it would have too much impact on the neighborhood. <br />Moorse stated that he did not have an objective size to propose for the patio or recommendation to <br />start with. <br />White pointed out that, based on Met studies, parking is a key issue. He noted that, as a municipal <br />lot, the Council must control the parking situation in order to meet transit station needs of its <br />citizens. Although he recognized the applicant's cooperation in providing the city with required <br />items, he agreed that the size of the patio should be defined. <br />While she recognized that the parking out front was public, Mayor Peterson questioned whether <br />there was a designated motorcycle parking area. ' <br />Anderst stated that he did not have a designated motorcycle parking area. <br />Murphy asked the applicant if he wished to table in order to review what other Hennepin County <br />businesses are doing with regard to their smoker's patios, or move forward with a vote. <br />Anderst stated that he had been tabled numerous times and would prefer to move forward. • <br />Murphy stated that he would vote for reducing the smoker's patio by 40 %, limiting the hours of <br />operation for the patio to last call or 1AM, call for an annual review of the entire CUP when the <br />liquor license comes up for renewal including the parking, police findings, and smoker's patio. <br />Brokl stated that, as with any CUP, it will follow the land. He noted that, as such, it can be <br />reviewed at anytime during the course of the year to ensure existing conditions are being met. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that, in her opinion, this is an overaggressive improvement or expansion to <br />the site which she could not support. She felt the saloon was going beyond the scope of a <br />neighborhood bar encouraging others to come in from a broader market area. <br />White questioned what would happen if the new users added an additional need of 12 -15 spaces. <br />Brokl stated that if parking is an issue, there is no measurable standard to base the parking on now. <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to approve the Resolution with the changes discussed <br />this evening including a reduction in the size of the smoker's patio by 40 %, adding a <br />condition that the entire CUP would be reviewed annually with the renewal of the liquor <br />license with regard to the smoker's patio, police findings, parking, etc. and that the patio <br />closes at 1:00 AM. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2. Mayor Peterson dissenting as stated earlier, <br />Sansevere dissenting due to his belief that the patio seating should also be decreased by 40 %. <br />• <br />PAGE 6 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.