My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
03-27-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:27:28 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:27:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 27, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Huddy stated that the Park Commission has been energized by recent joint meetings with the City <br />Council and looks forward to assessing public support for parks and their various activities with an <br />upcoming periodic survey. He invited council members to attend the upcoming meeting next <br />Monday at which a representative from Orono soccer will discuss ideas for the Bederwood practice <br />area. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS — Roland Jurgens <br />Jurgens stated that he had nothing to report, but would remain for questions. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were none. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />5. #05 -3121 NARROWS SALOON, 3382 SHORELINE DRIVE — CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT — RESOLUTION NO. 5440 <br />Gaffron reviewed a draft resolution for the revised Class H Restaurant expansion proposal by the <br />Narrows Saloon containing various noteworthy findings for consideration by Council. Gaffron <br />noted that a small, less than 1 %, structural coverage variance would be necessary in conjunction <br />with the resolution. He elaborated on several findings pertaining to the smoker's patio, its size, <br />screening, and hours of operation, as well as, the potential to convert its entrance into a vestibule <br />arrangement. <br />Gaffron explained that, based on the findings, approval of the application should be subject to 11 <br />conditions and expanded on those within the draft resolution. Some of which included, access <br />doors and vestibules, separated private party room, hours of operation and entertainment, the <br />approval of a smokers patio for a one year trial basis, adequate parking configuration and limited <br />conflict with the use of the municipal lot, and more. <br />Jim Sanford, Attorney for the Narrows Saloon, commented that the applicant would prefer not to <br />enlarge the vestibule to include the smoker's access. <br />Sansevere questioned the size of the proposed smoker's patio and stated that, in his opinion, it is <br />much larger than necessary. He asked whether the saloon was saving the space for a proposed <br />future restaurant expansion to encompass outside dining, which would have a bigger impact on <br />parking later. In addition, Sansevere suggested that time parameters or hours for the patio be <br />assigned so that people don't loiter after last call. <br />Anderst, of the Narrows Saloon, stated that customers would not be allowed to hang out on the <br />patio when the bar is closed, since the only access is through the building. <br />Mayor Peterson asked Gaffron what the property owner would typically `be allowed' in his <br />backyard. 0 1 <br />PAGE 4 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.