My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:26:56 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:26:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(3. #05 -3121 NARROWS SALOON, 3382 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Gaffron noted the resolution would also address some of the other concerns raised previously that were <br />not discussed this evening. Gaffron requested the"applicants sign an extension of the review period <br />tonight. 1 <br />McMillan moved, Murphy seconded, to table i <br />Shoreline Drive, and to direct Staff to draft an <br />4. #05 -3136 TROY BROITZMAN,1860 <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />Troy Broitzman, Applicant, was present. <br />1 #05 -3121, Narrows Saloon, 3382 <br />resolution. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />DRIVE — VARIANCE AND <br />Gaffron stated the applicant has submitted a revised plan and is requesting an average lakeshore setback <br />variance and a lot width variance. Gaffron noted this property is located in a two -acre zone, with the lot <br />consisting of 1.9 acres and being 133 feet wide. I <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their February 20t" meeting and voted 6 -0 to <br />recommend approval of the revised plan, granting lot width and average setback variances, with the <br />condition that the grading be minimized as much as possible to preserve any trees that are existing on the <br />site and conditioned on submittal of a landscape plan depicting the mitigation of the sight line views for <br />the neighbors prior to Council review of the application. <br />• <br />Gaffron illustrated on the overhead the location of the proposed residence and the two adjoining <br />residences. The applicant has located the house so; that its greatest encroachment past the average setback <br />line is 100 feet, defined by the two adjacent lakeshore homes. Based on discussions at the September and <br />October Council meetings, the applicant has located the house to meet an average setback line defined by <br />the immediately adjacent home to the east and the second adjacent home to the west. The property <br />owners at 1910 Heritage have requested that the house be located slightly rearward to line up with their <br />extended front line and avoid impacting their lake views to the right. <br />In addition, the applicant has submitted a screen <br />lot line, with the potential to eventually provide <br />Gaffron stated the applicant has revised his plan si; <br />The proposal now calls for cuts of 1,983 cubic yarc <br />that requires exportation of only 356 cubic yards fr <br />grading plan does not have the negative impacts or <br />current plan could be construed as not rising to the <br />conditional use permit. Gaffron noted the City Enp <br />one acceptable. - <br />plan that would place evergreens along the southwest <br />vy screening of the new home from that side. <br />nificantly since the last time it was before the Council. <br />s and fills of 1,626 cubic yards, resulting in a balance <br />►m the site. Staff has concluded that the proposed <br />the neighborhood that earlier plans created, and the <br />hresholds that would require a land alteration <br />ineer has reviewed the various proposals and fords this <br />Gaffron stated this application was submitted prior to the new wetland ordinance and that the applicant <br />meets the 26 -foot setback that was required at the time the application was submitted. <br />Gaffron indicated the applicant is proposing to remove the existing driveway to Shoreline Drive and <br />create a new driveway to Heritage Drive at the ream similar to the layout of his two adjacent lakeshore <br />neighbors. The proposed driveway meets the City's 26' wetland setback that was in effect at the time this <br />PAGE 9 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.