Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. _ • <br />(3. #05 -3121 NARROWS SALOON, 3382 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Sanford stated in regard to the parking issue, there are 176 parking stalls available as contained in Staff s <br />report and 167 parking stalls are required. <br />Sansevere stated because this is a public parking lot, he would like to be assured that the other businesses <br />will still have parking available to them. <br />Murphy stated in his opinion the applicants have done a lot of hard work on revising their plan and that he <br />wishes it turns out like it is depicted on paper. Murphy inquired whether the design of the arborvitae and <br />the berm is such that people could come and go between the arborvitae. <br />Anderst stated a wrought iron fence would also be located in that area, which would prevent people from <br />gaining access to the patio area from the outside. <br />Murphy inquired where the door for the kitchen would be located. <br />Sudheimer stated it was not included on the plan. <br />Murphy stated this is similar to the last time where things are not depicted on the plan. <br />Sanford pointed out on the overhead where the doorway would be and that the two pool tables may be <br />eliminated. <br />Murphy stated in his opinion the parking issue remains unanswered. Murphy commented he has visited <br />this area and that finding available parking at times is difficult. Murphy stated it is difficult to determine <br />what the parking needs will be for this business. <br />Murphy stated the minutes of the October 10`h meeting reflect that the liquor license for the establishment <br />is only good for the space that was applied for, and that Orono Police Chief Good has indicated she has <br />not seen any paperwork for a new liquor license based on the additional space. Murphy inquired whether <br />the City Council should be asking for a liquor license renewal first. <br />Brokl stated the general rule is on liquor license applications the space is defined and that if alcohol were <br />to be served on the patio space, it would need to be included in the calculation. <br />Murphy inquired what would be required with the expansion. <br />Brokl stated their liquor license would need to be supplemented. Brokl stated there would be no basis to <br />deny the liquor license based on this application unless there were other issues that were raised. <br />Murphy stated the other main concerns in the past have been the noise and motorcycle traffic in the area <br />but that the main issue in his view is parking. <br />Anderst stated City Staff and their parking consultant have said that there is adequate parking. <br />Sansevere inquired what the occupancy would be increased to with the expansion. <br />Sanford stated the occupancy would be increased to 265. <br />PAGE 6 of 27 <br />