Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(3. #05 -3121 NARROWS SALOON, 3382 <br />3. No amplification or speakers outside <br />outdoor noise impacts. <br />4. The easterly access door to the outsic <br />but shall be a self - closing door to elb <br />5. CUP approval should be subject to a <br />one year of operation. <br />Gaffron noted the liquor license is a separate lice] <br />stated the moratorium for the Navarre area is still <br />scheduled for the end of March to gather input fr( <br />public investment in Navarre. <br />Staff requests the following issues be considered 1 <br />1. Is the proposed location of the use in <br />purposes of the B -1 District and the C <br />2. Will the location of the proposed use <br />operated or maintained be detrimenta. <br />injurious to properties or improvemer. <br />3. Is the proposed use compatible with f. <br />neighborhoods? If not, what aspects <br />available to mitigate those aspects? <br />4. Is the proposed use supported by ade( <br />availability? How will other users of <br />might the expansion affect future dev <br />Gaffron requested the City Council provide <br />should proceed. <br />Sanford stated this current proposal reflects a c <br />area needs. Sanford stated this application is a <br />bar and that the applicants are desirous of expa <br />stated the applicants have made substantial cho <br />previous meeting. Sanford noted the Planning <br />application prior to the further revisions. <br />DRIVE, Continued) <br />building or in the outdoor seating area, to limit any <br />seating area from the restaurant shall not be bi -fold <br />inate direct noise /music impacts to the outside area. <br />)ecific written condition that the use be reviewed after <br />application from the zoning application. Gaffron <br />effect and that there is a neighborhood meeting <br />interested parties to help guide future private and <br />the Council: <br />cord with the objectives of the Zoning Code and the <br />nprehensive Plan? <br />d the proposed conditions under which it will be <br />the public health, safety welfare, or be materially <br />in the vicinity? <br />surrounding business district and residential <br />the use make it incompatible? What methods are <br />e infrastructure, primarily access and parking <br />municipal lot be affected by the expansion? How <br />�ment or reinvestment in Navarre? <br />to Staff and the applicants on how this application <br />in the business plan that addresses what the local <br />ing more towards a restaurant type operation than a <br />the restaurant portion of their business. Sanford <br />to the plans relating to the concerns raised at the <br />mission has previously recommended approval of the <br />Sanford noted the applicants have made changes to address the concerns of the neighbors, which includes <br />the elimination of the outside seating area, restricting music to address the concerns regarding the noise, <br />the limited parking in the area. Sanford stated the patio area is designed to be more of a smoking area and <br />that the applicants are proposing screening for this urea to help further reduce any noise that may come <br />from that area. <br />Sanford stated the parking study previously submitted mainly dealt with the municipal lot and concluded <br />that there would be sufficient parking. Sanford pointed out the gas station parking was not included in the <br />parking study nor in the city's calculations. Sanford stated the area to the right of the Narrows Saloon by <br />the gas station provides some parking for the area, which would then bring the available parking to within <br />the city requirements. Sanford stated 37.5 percent of the parking lot would be available during peak times <br />once those extra spots are incorporated into the calculation. <br />PAGE 3 of 27 <br />