Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. #05 -3136 TROYBROITZMAN, 18607SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Coward stated the applicant indicated to him that <br />house on the lake but that in his opinion, given th <br />building on Smith Bay and Orono. Coward state <br />meets all of Orono's codes but that it does not ha <br />Coward commented there also was an issue on v <br />once it was constructed and that there have been <br />and whether they would be removed or kept. Cc <br />lot and the trees that would be affected by the bu <br />Coward displayed an overhead depicting the <br />view versus what is currently there. Coward <br />have concerns with. <br />Charrier stated he has voiced their concerns with <br />applicant yesterday. <br />its objective is to make this house the most visible <br />proposed design, it will become the most notorious <br />there could be a house constructed on this property that <br />to be the house proposed. <br />r the applicant was going to reside in the house <br />.cting stories from the applicant regarding the trees <br />displayed an overhead of the current house on the <br />;ed house and the difference it would have on their <br />there are many issues with this application that they <br />trees and that he did discuss the tree issue with the <br />Morris Nelson, 1900 Shoreline Drive, stated he has expressed his concerns all along to the City and <br />directly to the applicant and that he did express a concern that a professional architect be consulted and <br />that he was told by the applicant that that is not going to happen and that he has 15 years experience. <br />Nelson commented the plans have changed a number of times. Nelson stated there are not a large number <br />of trees between his house and the current house but they are not needed because he lives in a one -story <br />house, which fits in with the neighborhood. Nelson stated the proposed house is significantly larger, <br />which raises concerns that the nearby properties would be economically impacted if this house does not <br />sell. Nelson stated a beautiful house could be constructed on this lot and that he does not want to live <br />next to the house that is being proposed. Nelson requested that the application be denied. <br />Murphy stated the numbers used by Mr. Coward a <br />Coward stated he used the numbers off of the plan <br />alcoves or dormers. Coward stated he found 7890 <br />square feet times three for one portion of the hous( <br />1000 feet for the detached garage. <br />different from what he has seen. <br />that he viewed and that he did not account for the <br />square feet in the main house, which consists of 2630 <br />64 by 30 for the attached garage times three, and <br />Murphy stated they show a footprint of 4600 feet, w; <br />would bring it up to about 14,000 square feet. I <br />Murphy questioned the amount of fill and whether <br />would have on the landscaping. <br />Gaffron stated the fill does not appear to have any <br />the grading and cubic yards is the traffic coming ar. <br />land is left. Gaffron stated Staff does not feel it wi <br />house better on the property than what was original <br />Murphy inquired whether the fill is intended to ere; <br />essentially three levels in the structure, which <br />City determines what impact the grading and fill <br />fect on the drainage. Gaffron stated the impacts of <br />going from the site during construction and how the <br />leave a strange topography and will help to place the <br />i proposed. <br />a walkout in the front. <br />PAGE 15 of 27 <br />