My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
02-27-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:26:21 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:26:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Febniary 27, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(3. JAMESTOWIVROAD SAMTARYSEWER PROJECT, Continued) <br />would be for the City Council to adopt a resolution ordering preparation of plans and specifications <br />for the project. <br />Andy Page, 3050 Jamestown Road, stated that although he had a conforming unit at present he felt <br />hooking up was a good idea and asked whether the $9,700 would be assessed to the property or the <br />individual. In addition, Page asked how the cost would be affected if several people chose not to <br />participate at this time. <br />Attorney Brokl stated that the assessment goes against the property and would be assessed two <br />times a year with property taxes and would need to be disclosed if the property were to be placed <br />on the market. <br />Kellogg stated that the cost would be assessed against all 13 properties, even though not all might <br />be participating at this time. The City would carry the costs of those not participating until they <br />choose to hook up, at which time they would be responsible for the necessary fees. <br />Murphy pointed out that if you choose not to participate at this time and hook up later, you will still <br />be subject to all the same costs as you would now, and in fact, due to inflationary estimates likely <br />more. <br />John Ryder, 3045 County Road 6, stated that back in 1985 he installed a conforming septic system <br />at the front of his property based on discussions with city staff at that time who had led him to - <br />believe that an eventual sewer line would likely run down County Road 6 for him to hook into. <br />Since that time, the Jamestown system, which abuts the rear of his property has been designed and <br />if forced to hook into the sewer system here this would place undue burden on both he and his <br />neighbor at 3025 County Road 6. He questioned the logic for them to hook into a system which <br />runs behind them, especially when all other utilities run in front of them down County Road 6. <br />Kellogg stated that there is a provision in the city to eventually run lines down county Road 6 on <br />the south side which they could hook into. He indicated that, if the Council chose to, he could work <br />up a new feasibility study which would run down County Road 6 and determine the costs. <br />Mayor Peterson asked whether the line could run down County Road 6 to pick up these two <br />neighbors and then cut through between the residences to reach Jamestown. <br />Kellogg stated that this would be possible with the cooperation of the neighbors and easements. <br />Moorse conunented that if it is the intent of the City to run lines down County Road 6 in the future, <br />he questioned what impact it might have to run the line to two of the County Road 6 properties now <br />and the carrying costs incurred by the City to do so. <br />Although the final two property owners on Country Road 6 had conforming units, he suggested <br />they be contacted and included in the discussion because they might wish to be a part of this <br />project extension. He conunented that the longer anyone waits to participate, the more expensive it <br />will be. <br />PAGE 2 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.