Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 13, 2006_ <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />( #05 -3131 Steve Bohl of Bohland Development, Continued) <br />White commented the school pays for the striping on the trail between the middle school and the high <br />school. <br />White recommended the City Council discuss the six items raised by Planner Gaffron. <br />The consensus of the City Council was that the revised setback for Lot 10 is acceptable. <br />White inquired how the City Council feels about the floor area ratio and the points raised by Staff. <br />Murphy stated he does not think the City Council should spend a lot of time discussing whether three - <br />season porches should be included in the FAR calculation. Murphy stated that the open decks and three - <br />season porches should probably be included in the calculation. Murphy stated there is some leeway to <br />decide whether those types of structures should be included in the calculation. <br />Bohl stated he did look at a few different options to reduce the amount of massing. Bohl stated he would <br />like to exclude a screen porch from the floor area ratio if the FAR is reduced to 0.4. Bohl stated the size <br />of the screen porch could be regulated with covenants to a 12' by 14'. Bohl stated a four - season or three - <br />season porch would be included within the floor area ratio. • <br />The City Council indicated they are in agreement with the comments made by the applicant. <br />White inquired if the Council feels the church parcel should be exempt from the SW &DT fee. White <br />stated in his view since the size of the church property is being reduced, that he would not be opposed to <br />waiving the fee. <br />Kellogg stated there is a drainage boundary depicted on the overhead and that currently the drainage in <br />that portion of the property is not treated but would be treated in the future under the proposal and would <br />be an improvement over what currently exists. <br />White inquired whether the City or the developer should be responsible for maintaining the trail. <br />Murphy inquired who would maintain the trail along the road. <br />Gaffron stated the road itself would act as a trail and the City would be maintaining the road. <br />White inquired who would be responsible for striping the street. <br />Murphy inquired whether the City is equipped to stripe the roads at the present time. <br />Moorse stated the City currently hires someone to do the striping. <br />• <br />PAGE 4 of 25 <br />