My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
02-13-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:25:53 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:25:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />• Monday, February 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(Brian Fulmer, The Dog House, Continued) <br />McMillan noted that the City of Long Lake is loca <br />taken into consideration. <br />Sansevere inquired how close the nearest neighbor <br />adjacent to the Luce Line, which also needs to be <br />be. <br />Fulmer noted the 875 Wayzata Boulevard property i i almost 11 acres. <br />Gaffron displayed an aerial photo of the Wayzata <br />Sansevere inquired whether there could be a pro <br />located to the Wayzata property. <br />Brokl noted that a public hearing would need to be <br />White stated in his view it would be appropriate to <br />provided. <br />and surrounding area. <br />period placed on this use if the operation is <br />for whichever location is decided upon. <br />this discussion until further information is <br />Murphy stated he is reluctant to say he would be in favor of relocating the operation to 875 Wayzata <br />• Boulevard without formal plans being submitted. Murphy indicated he has grave concerns with locating <br />s op <br />this near the Luce Line and the Long Lakeneighborhood. <br />Sansevere commented he would have preferred that <br />ago rather than waiting until the last minute. <br />White stated he would like to see a plan showing <br />Sansevere suggested the dog runs be located as far <br />McMillan concurred that this matter needs to go <br />made. <br />Fulmer would have approached the City months <br />the property would be utilized. <br />from the Luce Line as possible. <br />the proper process before a decision can be <br />Gaffron stated the City currently does not have an established business licensing process. Gaffron stated <br />the City currently licenses garbage haulers and liquor establishments but that the City would need to <br />develop appropriate language to deal with this type of operation. <br />Sansevere encouraged Mr. Fulmer to decide which property would work best for him and then proceed <br />forward. i <br />Gaffron stated a public hearing would need to be held on each different property and that that would not <br />be ideal. Gaffron concurred that Mr. Fulmer should decide on which property would work best. <br />McMillan stated from a public perception the Eisinger property might be more workable. <br />0 It was the consensus of the City Council that Mr. Fulmer work with Staff further on this matter. <br />PAGk21 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.