My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:52:21 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 3:48:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 12, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. #05 -3131 STEVE BOHL OF BORLAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., 190 WILLOW <br />DRIVE NORTHAND 177 GLENDALE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Services, to address the conservation design goals and objectives. The topics addressed by AES include <br />forest preservation, forest enhancement and expansion, wetland preservation, wetland enhancement and <br />expansion, vegetated buffer establishment, stormwater management, and ecological restoration and <br />management. <br />The Planning Commission concluded that the RPUD standards for SFR development are generally <br />appropriate for this site, with a few minor revisions. The proposed SFR development for eight homes has <br />an average dry buildable lot area of slightly under 16,000 square feet, with no new building lots less than <br />14,000 square feet as recommended by the Planning Commission. This fits into the general range of lot <br />sizes in the surrounding neighborhood. The Hackberry neighborhood directly to the west in Orono has <br />existing developed SFR lots generally ranging in size from 17,000 square feet to 22,000 square feet. <br />The Planning Commission has recommended that the new road be a private cul -de -sac road. This is <br />reasonable, even though this is becoming an "urban" area of the City, because of the rezoning to RPUD <br />and because only a small number of homes will be served, with minimal potential for connection through <br />to another road. However, underlying City road and utility easements should be granted, so that if the <br />church property is someday further developed and connects a through road to Glendale Drive, the option <br />to make it public will exist. Because this will be an urban development, the City will ultimately own and <br />maintain the sanitary sewer lines. <br />The RPUD standards require that each RPUD development shall provide a minimum of ten percent of the <br />gross project area in private recreational uses for project residents. The Planning Commission determined <br />that the church lot is not considered part of the RPUD development, meaning that 0.5 acre must be <br />devoted to private recreation area. <br />Staff finds that this rezoning/subdivision proposal has been revised a number of times and has generally <br />or specifically addressed all concerns raised by Staff and the Planning Commission. Staff would <br />recommend that Council direct Staff to draft a resolution for General Concept Plan Approval for review at <br />the January 9°i Council meeting. <br />Steve Bohl stated he did compile a list of questions that he would like addressed. Bohl stated he would <br />like the trail addressed and whether the street should be public or private. Bohl stated typically in his <br />experience this type of road would be a public road rather than a private road. <br />Bohl recommended the developer construct the trail and questioned whether an outlot should be created <br />or whether the land the trail is on should be dedicated to the City. Bohl stated if the trail is to be a public <br />trail, he would like the long -term maintenance of the trail to be assumed by the City. Bohl also <br />questioned who would assume liability if something happens on the trail. <br />Murphy questioned whether the Planning Commission or Staff has a definite idea of how the trail system <br />within this development would connect to the outer world. Murphy questioned whether a trail crossing in <br />front of the fire station would be the ideal situation. <br />Gappa stated the reason the east side of the road was selected is because the City controls the fire station <br />property and the land to the west is fully developed and there is no chance of obtaining easements at this <br />PAGE 6 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.