My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
11-14-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:51:59 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 3:46:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #05 -3142 Chapman, Continued) <br />Murphy stated his main concern dealt with the sight lines across the street. <br />Chapman stated he has spoken with that neighbor and that the neighbor is fine with the proposal. <br />Murphy commented the lot is unique and that he is not opposed to the second recommendation of Staff of <br />a 10' by 10'shed if the shed resembles the house. <br />Murphy noted the lot to the west has a dock on it with a jet boat parked next to it. <br />Chapman stated there is a 30 -foot driveway goingtown to the lake and there is an easement down to the <br />water. Chapman indicated he did offer to buy the City's land in order to increase his acreage but was told <br />that the City would not be interested in selling the corridor. <br />Gaffron confirmed that the City is not interested i selling the 30 -foot corridor and that an outlot was <br />created to the west as part of a subdivision a number of years ago. <br />Sansevere moved to direct Staff to draft a resol lion approving the construction of a 10' by 12' foot <br />shed, subject to the removal of the sidewalk and the placement of steppingstones, consistent with <br />• recommendation number two outlined in Staff's' report. <br />I <br />Chapman inquired if steppingstones are used, would he then be permitted a 12' by 12' shed. <br />Gundlach stated if steppingstones are used in places of the concrete sidewalk, there would be a net <br />decrease in hardcover of 3.5 square feet if a 12' by 12' shed is constructed. <br />Sansevere amended his motion to direct staff to! draft a resolution approving the construction of a <br />12' by 12' shed, subject to the removal of the sidewalk and the placement of steppingstones, <br />consistent with recommendation number two outlined in Staffs report. <br />Gundlach indicated the majority of the Planning Commission did not vote in favor of the shed but that the <br />dissenting commissioner had suggested a 10' by 10' shed with the removal of the sidewalk and placement <br />of steppingstones. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Peterson Opposed. <br />Peterson stated she has a problem with trading <br />• <br />7` <br />coverage for structural hardcover. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.