My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-24-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:51:51 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 3:45:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a <br />r <br />Ca <br />MINUTES 'OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 24, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clo ck p.m. <br />Gaffron stated that, in terms of stormwater and d Iainage fees these do not come into play at this <br />time, but may in the future if the 21 -acre parcel is further subdivided. <br />Murphy stated that he had no problem with the combination of the two smaller properties, but was <br />more concerned in the event the larger parcel is sold off what impact this might have. <br />Dayton pointed out that it would be his desire that they find someone to purchase the whole 21 -acre <br />parcel and keep it in its current state, but if it is soli and gets subdivided, he would like to combine <br />the two smaller lots for his own later use. <br />John Winston, Orono, applicant's representative, stated that although no one knows what the future <br />holds, the applicant wishes to create 2 lots where there are currently three. He pointed out that the <br />city would have an opportunity to address the street easement issue if forced to subdivide at a later <br />date. In addition, the applicant is asking the Council to approve a waiver of the accounting statute <br />at this time. ;I <br />Barrett stated that if the new owner of the 21 -acre parcel chooses to subdivide for future <br />development, the City would likely have a second glance. <br />Murphy asked whether the waiver could inc <br />driveway or road easement are saved for future <br />Dayton stated that it was his intent to keep the i <br />Murphy maintained that it is the City's <br />Winston recommended that he and the city <br />applicant's access. <br />Gaffron stated that between him and the two <br />resolution and easement document for the next <br />Murphy pointed out that the City has private <br />make their own decisions. <br />Dayton agreed to table the application in order to <br />Murphy moved, Acting Mayor Sansevere <br />resolution. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT <br />Murphy pointed out that the Brown Road <br />ceremony. <br />White asked when the Old Crystal Bay Road I <br />the easement requirement to ensure that the <br />simple today. <br />that they be thinking ahead. <br />a declaration of easement which ensures this <br />he felt confident they could work up a <br />all over the community in which the owners <br />the resolution and easement documents. <br />to table the application pending a draft <br />opened last Friday with a ribbon - cutting <br />was slated to be opened. <br />PAGE '7 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.