My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-10-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:51:45 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 3:45:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 10, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />( #05 -3136 Troy Broitzman, Continued) <br />Murphy stated the point that he is trying to make is that the applicant should take into consideration that <br />he is building on one of the. most pristine pieces of land in the Midwest and recommended that a qualified <br />architect be consulted. <br />Curtis noted an extension in writing would need to be submitted by the applicant. <br />Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to refer Application #05 -3136, Troy Broitzman,1860 <br />Shoreline Drive, back to the Planning Commission. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />8. #05 -3149 TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH, 2060 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH — <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />Peterson moved, Murphy seconded, to table Application #05 -3149, Trinity Lutheran Church, <br />2060 Sixth Avenue North, at the request of the applicant, to the November 14, 2005 City Council <br />meeting. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />• <br />*9. #05 -3151 GARY AND SANDRA BARON, 3619 NORTH SHORE DRIVE — VARIANCES — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5389 <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5389, a Resolution granting lot <br />width, lot area, lake setback, and hardcover variances for the property located at 3619 North Shore <br />Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />White stated in his view it is inappropriate for the Park Commissioner to lecture the Council on how inept <br />the Planning Commission is. White stated in his opinion the Planning Commission is going a good job. <br />Murphy commented that also happened two weeks ago with another Park Commissioner. <br />McMillan noted that commissioner was commenting on a specific application. McMillan stated she <br />would be willing to call the Commissioner and discuss the situation. <br />White stated he has been informed that it costs the City of Minneapolis $30,000 for each dog park. <br />Sansevere commented the Planning Commission in his view does a marvelous job and that it is unusual • <br />that the Council differs from the recommendation of the Planning Commission. <br />PAGE 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.