10-10-2005 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, October 10, 2005 • 7:00 o'hock p.m. ( #05 -3136 Troy Broitzman, Continued) footage of 12,014 square feet of livable space plus a 1,683.9 square foot attached garage. With this revision, the applicant has indicated that by reducing the size of the footprint and removing the two -sided walkout, the proposed site grading will be reduced. Curtis noted the driveway has been relocated off of, Heritage Drive and the parking area on the west is now located approximately 21 feet from the side lot'line, which allows for the appropriate screening. The Planning ommission voted 3 -4 to recommendea roval of the lot width variance and to recommend g .� Pp approval of the conditional use permit based on the previous plans. This motion failed. A second motion to approve the lot width variance and to deny the conditional use permit was made and passed 4 -3. The applicant has revised the floor plans and elevation views of the proposed home. The applicant has indicated that the proposed site grading will be reduced from the previous plan. If Council is satisfied with the revised plans, the applicant should be directed to provide a revised survey reflecting the plans along with a revised grading and drainage plan. The City Engineer should review this plan prior to final variance and conditional use permit approvals. 'I - I Since the Planning Commission recommended deni Council refer these revisions back to the Planning C • would recommend that in order to allow ample time' application should be referred to the November 215c comfortable with the revisions of the house plans ar application back to the Planning Commission, Staff review the revisions in the survey, grading and draii Sansevere stated he is in support of Staff's recomm� Commission pending review by the City Engineer. White inquired whether the amount of excavation Curtis stated the applicant has indicated it has been Staff has not seen formalized plans showing the red White stated he likes the access off of Heritage Dri, setback. Gaffron demonstrated where the average lakeshore the question becomes whether it is reasonable to us setback. Gaffron stated there appears to be minima _ owners. Peterson concurred that this application should be s }s' . •. inquired whether both walkouts have been eliminat i1 of the previous plan, Staff would recommend the ommission for their review. Additionally, Staff for the city engineer to review the revisions, the Planning Commission meeting. If the Council is d wishes to grant approvals without referring this would recommend the City Engineer be given time to cage plans prior to the granting of final approvals. tion to refer this application back to the Planning the site has been reduced at all. reduced with the revisions. Curtis stated White inquired about the average lakeshore etback would be located on this lot. Gaffron stated the next property over as the average lakeshore impact on the lake views of the adjoining property back to the Planning Commission.. Peterson PAGE 21