My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-10-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:51:45 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 3:45:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES jOF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 10, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #05 -3121 Narrows Saloon, Continued) <br />The conclusions of the study indicate there is adequate parking available and that there are 30 parking <br />stalls available on private property that were not included in the study but remain available for users of <br />the businesses, now and in the future; and the peak parking demand for the Narrows will be Saturday <br />evenings, when a very low parking demand is experienced for the other businesses. <br />The City's traffic consultant reviewed this parking sti <br />conclusions. One, the study did not address the parki . <br />municipal lot based on the square footages of particul <br />of parking lot usage at certain peak times. Two, the s <br />the other businesses might generate should they re -de <br />demand of the proposed expanded Narrows' operatioi <br />Gaffron stated the Council should consider the <br />1. How or whether use of the municipal lot <br />establish a fair apportionment; <br />• 2. Whether the fact that the striping is substan <br />many stalls would be lost by restriping it to <br />3. Whether the demands of an expanded <br />businesses and entities using the lot; <br />and provided a number of findings and <br />required by City code for the various users of the <br />uses. Rather, the study focused on actual counts <br />ly did not address the potential parking demand <br />lop, and how that correlates to the parking <br />ild be apportioned to the various users and how to <br />and is a factor in the functionality of the lot; how <br />t code; <br />will cause parking issues for the existing <br />4. Whether approval of an expanded Narrows' operation will ultimately limit the future expansion <br />or redevelopment of businesses that rely on the lot, or have negative impacts on the level of non - <br />business uses of the lot. <br />Gaffron stated the applicants have not proposed any additional signage. With the proposed expansion, the <br />applicant would now be permitted 112 square feet of total signage with a single sign not to exceed 50 <br />square feet. . I <br />Gaffron indicated a number of concerns were raised during the public hearings and include the following: <br />liquor accessibility to outdoor patrons; control of patron overflow to parking lot or surrounding <br />neighborhood; noise impacts to neighborhoods to thejnorth and south from open doors, exterior speaker <br />systems, late night motorcycle traffic; overnight parking, and litter in the municipal lot. While a few of <br />these issues have been addressed by building design and site planning, other issues cannot be addressed <br />by building design and could potentially be addressed through conditions attached to the CUP or the <br />liquor license. <br />Gaffron stated the issue of whether the Narrows Saloon was in compliance with the 2000 Conditional Use <br />Permit was also discussed. The current CUP contains six specific conditions of approval: <br />PAGE 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.