Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />*7. REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT — BIRCH LANE STORM SEWER PROJECT <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve Request for Final Payment, Birch Lane Storm Sewer <br />Project to Midwest Asphalt, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota, in the amount of $7,813.68. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve Change Order No. 1, Birch Lane Storm Sewer Project <br />to Midwest Asphalt, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota, in the amount of $958.61. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT, CONTINUED <br />Anne Latterelle, 3505 Livingston Avenue, Navarre, stated the Orono Police Department received a <br />barking dog complaint on their dog on August 22 "d. Latterelle indicated the Orono Police had posted the <br />notice on their front door but that they usually access their house through the garage door. Latterelle <br />stated they did not become aware of the notice until late Friday afternoon. <br />Latterelle stated on September 2 "d, they were informed the police seized their dog due to poor living <br />conditions. Latterelle indicated they were told they needed to respond to the notice within 24 hours. <br />Latterelle stated the notice does not state that they have 24 hours to respond. Latterelle indicated they do <br />feed the dog every morning and every evening but that they are now facing charges on cruelty to animals. <br />White inquired what type of dog this is. <br />• <br />Latterelle stated it is a purebred German Short-Hair. Latterelle indicated their dog is currently under the <br />care of a veterinarian and that the dog has experienced weight gains and weight losses during the entire <br />time they have had the dog. <br />Latterelle indicated the police department informed them that this item would be on the agenda tonight. <br />Barrett stated Sergeant Erickson did discuss this matter with him and he has been informed that the dog <br />has been moved to the Humane Society. Barrett stated according to state statute, the dog owner has the <br />right to appeal the action taken by the police department. <br />Latterelle indicated they have raised the dog since he was a pup and that it has caused great emotional <br />distress to her children. Latterelle stated the dog does have a weight issue and a liver issue, which is <br />being watched by their veterinarian. <br />Peterson inquired whether the veterinarian records have been provided to the police department. <br />Latterelle stated the police department only recently contacted the veterinarian. Latterelle indicated the <br />Humane Society informed them that their dog was on a ten -day hold and would be released today but that <br />they still have not gotten the dog back. <br />White inquired whether a license is required to keep the dog. <br />Barrett stated the dog was not seized for failure to obtain a license. Barrett noted this is the second notice . <br />given to the owners that the dog did not have food and water. <br />PAGE 6 <br />