My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:50:50 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:54:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 27, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />5. . #05 -3097 Hashem Abukhadra,1745 Fox Street — Subdivision, Continued <br />2. Lot 6 as a back -lot — In order to eliminate as many accesses onto Fox Street and to allow the existing house <br />to use the existing driveway, proposed Lot 6 has been suggested to be considered a back -lot; therefore, the lot and <br />existing house meets the 150% setback requirements. <br />3. Elimination of the existing accesses onto Fox Street — The applicant has expressed his desire to keep the <br />existing access onto,Fox Street for the guest house; whereas, staff and the Planning Commission have <br />recommended that it and the existing driveway access to the western end be eliminated at the time the new road is <br />completed. <br />4. Septic Sites for proposed Lot 6: Lot 6 contains the main house and guest house — Since the existing septic <br />sites are not adequate and non - compliant the applicants should be directed to submit a design for 2, 7- bedroom <br />sites, which would require a variance from the Septic Code. <br />5. Rural Oasis Study — Gundlach encouraged the Council to consider whether this property should or could be <br />required to. undergo additional planning steps prior to final plat based on preliminary conclusions of the Rural <br />Oasis study. <br />• <br />McMillan asked whether the parcel contained enough acreage to support the main house and guest house. <br />is <br />Gundlach acknowledged it did. <br />With regard to the Rural Oasis study, Murphy asked whether the City might like to see swales as opposed to curb <br />and gutter in this development. <br />Mark Gronberg, Gronberg & Associates, stated that the engineer had encouraged them to direct the storm water to <br />the NURP pond via buffer strips, and various treatment methods. He indicated that engineering swales would cost <br />them this entire construction season, as well as, be difficult to accomplish due to the grades near Fox Street. <br />Murphy maintained that the City had been studying alternatives to curb and gutter over the past year, and that he <br />would prefer the construction process be slowed in order to allow the applicant adequate time to consider other <br />treatment methods. <br />Gronberg pointed out that curb and gutter would only impact 8 acres, while an additional 13 acres would be treated <br />in other ways. In addition, Gronberg indicated that by using retaining walls near the curb and gutter, they avoid <br />losing numerous mature trees that would be lost to swales. <br />Sansevere cautioned the Council that what is decided in this instance might be precedent setting and questioned <br />what has been discussed with regard to the Rural Oasis study and how it could be implemented. <br />Moorse pointed out that what has been discussed with regard to the Rural Oasis Study must be incorporated into <br />the Comprehensive Plan and put into Ordinance form before the Council can enforce its vision. <br />Sansevere urged this and other developers to incorporate the Council's sentiments with regard to the Rural Oasis • <br />study into their developments until which time they are put into Ordinance form. <br />Page 4 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.