Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />U <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, J <br />7:00 o'c <br />( #05 -3114 Sever and Sharon Peterson, Continued) <br />McMillan stated in her view some credit should be <br />being located on their property. <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to direct Staff to <br />05 -3114, Sever and Sharon Peterson, 3145 North S <br />average lakeshore setback and hardcover at 28 pei <br />given to the applicants for the shared driveway. <br />Gaffron stated in his opinion there is justification for <br />driveway situation. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />10. JACK AND KAKI OLSON, 1966 <br />Jack Olson, 1966 Shadywood Road, was present. <br />13, 2005 <br />p.m. <br />to the applicants for a majority of the driveway <br />a resolution approving Application No. <br />Drive, granting of variances to lot width, <br />with the understanding that credit is being <br />the additional hardcover given the shared <br />ROAD — INQUIRY <br />• Curtis noted the Council in May 2005 approved a Resolution granting setback, hardcover, and lot <br />coverage variances to allow the construction of a 441 square foot detached one -story garage. The <br />property owners are now asking the council to examine the possibility of constructing an attached garage, <br />with the same footprint that was approved in May. The applicants are proposing to attach a two -story <br />20' by 22' garage to the house and eliminate the five - I foot separation between the buildings. <br />Staff feels the new request will require a new application as the previous application has been closed with <br />the resolution approval at the last Council meeting. If the Council determines that a two -story attached <br />garage proposal may have some merit, Staff would direct the applicants to make a new application for <br />review by the Planning Commission. <br />Staff further feels that a minimal two -story attached <br />existing house would make use of the space within t <br />space, would allow for better on site parking and we <br />as viewed from the channel. Curtis noted a 230 squ <br />limit for this property. <br />White stated in his opinion the two -story attached <br />Olson concurred, noting he has spoken with several <br />garage. <br />Gaffron stated Staff in the past was attempting to li <br />Gaffron recommended the applicants consider redu <br />• percent structural coverage and utilizing part of the <br />rage that adds approximately 230 square feet to the <br />existing residence, would create additional living <br />i limit the visual impact of the additional structure <br />foot addition would be within the lot coverage <br />makes more sense. <br />who have recommended the attached <br />this property to the 15 percent structural coverage. <br />g the size of the addition to stay within the 15 <br />isting house for garage. <br />PAGE 11 <br />