Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY C <br />Monday, <br />• 7:00 0' <br />• <br />• <br />*5. #05 -3074 SEAN AND MELISSA W. <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLE <br />McMillan moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt <br />hardcover variances and a conditional use per; <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />6. #05 -3091 CATHERINE SALLAS, 3635 <br />VARIANCE <br />Catherine Sallas, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting after -the <br />hardcover variance to allow an existing roof top <br />the southwest lot line on the roof of the existing <br />The neighboring property owners have provided <br />concerns. <br />The Planning Commission voted 4 -3 to recommend <br />with removal of all portions of the existing grade -le, <br />lakeshore setback. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the after -th <br />variance with the stipulation that an equivalent squ: <br />hardcover consisting of 52 square feet for the stairs <br />Murphy inquired whether Staff would be in: <br />OF THE <br />INCIL MEETING <br />ay 9, 2005 <br />ck p.m. <br />ILD,1379 PARK DRIVE — VARIANCE AND <br />NO. 5322 <br />SOLUTION NO. 5322, a Resolution granting <br />for the property located at 1379 Park Drive. <br />SHORE DRIVE — AFTER -THE -FACT <br />lake and side setback variances and a 0 -75' <br />to remain 50 feet from the lake and nine feet from <br />itional written comments and photos illustrating their <br />pproval of the after - the -fact variances in conjunction <br />;1 deck that extend lakeward of the average <br />act lake and side setback variances and hardcover <br />footage of hardcover be removed to offset the new <br />;essing the roof top deck. <br />deck. <br />Curtis stated Staff would need to inspect it in order to issue a building permit. <br />Gaffron stated it is his understanding the building in'spector has previously reviewed the deck and that <br />there are only some minor changes that need to be made to the deck. <br />Curtis stated she has gone up on top of the deck and that it appears to be stable. <br />Murphy indicated he has visited this site and that there appears to be a droop to the roofline, and <br />questioned whether the deck is really structurally stable. <br />Curtis stated the neighbors did provide a photograph of the deck, which may help to illustrate the <br />condition of the deck. Curtis noted the photograph does not depict that portion of the deck clearly. <br />PAGE 9 <br />