My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
05-09-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:50:25 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:52:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES, OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 9, 2005 <br />• 7:00 o'clock ck p.m. <br />( #05 -3103 Jack and Kari Olson, Continued) <br />Olson stated by approving their application, it would provide a safer environment for his family, allow the <br />property to blend in with its surroundings, and reduce hardcover and runoff into the lake. Olson <br />requested the Council take into account the physical limitations of the property when considering their <br />variance request. <br />Murphy indicated he has visited the site and that this lot is unique given the proximity to the channel. <br />Murphy noted this property is boxed in and small in size. Murphy inquired why they are pursuing a <br />detached garage rather than an attached garage. <br />Olson stated they are unable to afford an attached garage and are proposing a detached garage with a <br />doorway and walkway allowing easier access to the house. <br />Sansevere stated he is unable to recall any other prop i rty on the lake where the backside of the garage <br />faces the lake, and inquired how the garage would look aesthetically from the channel. <br />Olson stated they would insert windows on the channel side and that they are willing to plant bushes to <br />help screen the garage. Olson indicated they would construct the garage to match the house. <br />•Mrs. Olson pointed out there are also a number of trees that would help screen the garage from the <br />channel. I <br />Murphy stated in his view there does not appear to be a hardship. Murphy commented the other lots in <br />this area do have larger garages than what is being proposed here but that this garage would add to the <br />amount of structure on this lot. <br />Leslie indicated he was in support of the application and that the main issue that was discussed at the <br />Planning Commission was the amount of structural coverage on this lot and the fact that hardcover is <br />usually not traded for structural coverage. Leslie indicated a concern was expressed for the amount of <br />massing on this lot as it is viewed from the lake. Leslie stated in his view he would prefer to see a garage <br />with some windows and bushes screening it rather than three vehicles parked on an asphalt driveway. <br />White stated a 20' by 20' is really not a practical garage and that a 22' by 22' garage is better able to <br />accommodate two vehicles. White inquired why the'garage could not be attached to the house. <br />Mrs. Olson stated to attach the garage is almost <br />Sansevere pointed out the Council has never in the <br />granting a variance. <br />Mrs. Olson inquired whether the Council feels it is <br />• garage rather than $20,000 to $30,000. <br />P <br />the cost. <br />taken into account financial considerations when <br />to ask someone to spend $150,000 to add a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.