Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 25, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(8.#05-3080 INTERSPACE WEST, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, Continued) <br />Philip Carlson, of Interspace West, stated that they had brought the sidewalk in about as much as <br />they could and still allow for a required width for handicapped access. He reiterated that he would <br />be willing to work with neighbors to plant trees on their outlot to retain the proper `chi' — feng sui <br />on the lot. <br />Jackie Ricks, 2108 Sugarwoods Drive, stated that she thought the developer would be performing a <br />treesurve_y_on the�ita — <br />Gaffron pointed out that the City did not require the applicant to perform a tree survey, since the <br />trees would be removed during construction. <br />Carlson offered to give the neighbors any trees they wished to move from his site prior to <br />construction to add additional buffer to their outlot. <br />Mary Mileusnic, 2110 Sugarwoods, asked that the developer consider adding trees to the hillside. <br />r1 <br />U <br />Dick Schommer, 2106 Sugarwoods Drive, questioned how the developer could be allowed to begin <br />his grading 5' from the property line, when homeowners were required to stay 30' away from the <br />lot lines. He questioned how digging so close to the lot line might affect the trees on the <br />homeowners association outlot. <br />Murphy asked whether the applicant would be willing to indemnify anything that dies to be • <br />replaced. <br />Carlson stated that they would be putting up tree protection along the lot line. He indicated also <br />that he'd already promised to plant a large number of trees and would prefer not to go down the <br />path of which trees were killed due to construction or natural causes. <br />Murphy stated that it seemed to him that the developer had worked awfully hard to satisfy the <br />neighbors, which not too many developers take the time to do. He encouraged Carlson to be <br />mindful of the top shelf trees and keeping them populated or protected during construction. <br />McMillan pointed out that this proposal contains 45% greenspace on a commercial site which far <br />exceeds the 25% required by code. <br />Murphy noted that 2 -3 parking stalls would need to be removed in order to allow the applicant <br />space to pull back from the property line. <br />Gaffron maintained that, as proposed, the development was not `over parked', nor could they <br />remove additional spaces and satisfy code. <br />Richard Apple, 2101 Sugardwoods Drive, president of the Homeowner Association, asked who <br />would be responsible for maintenance of the landscaping. <br />Carlson replied that, as part of the covenants, the development is. • <br />PAGE 6of10 <br />