Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />ORONO CITY i <br />Monday, <br />7:00 c <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS — <br />As the Park Commission would not be <br />report. <br />OF THE <br />MEETING <br />kpril 25, 2005 <br />clock p.m. <br />Krogness <br />until next week, Krogness had nothing new to <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS L Roland Jurgens <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were none. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*5. #04 -3008 VALEK AND PALMER, <br />REARRANGEMENT (RE -PLAT) — RES( <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt <br />approving the Plat of Valeks Saga Hill Ada <br />4720/4750 Tonkaview Lane. VOTE: Ayes <br />*6. #04 -3010 TED CAPRA, 3534 IVY <br />I TONKAVIEW LANE — LOT LINE <br />NO. 5313 <br />SOLUTION NO. 5313, a Resolution <br />n, creating 3 lots where 5 lots currently exist at <br />ays 0. <br />— VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5314 <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5314, a Resolution approving <br />a hardcover variance for the 75 -250' zone at 30% hardcover and denying a 0 -75' zone <br />hardcover variance for 3534 Ivy Place. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />7. #05 -3074 SEAN AND MELISSA <br />AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />Curtis explained that the application was tabled <br />Engineer Tom Kellogg to review the applicants <br />within the 75 -250' zone to remain. This area w, <br />some retaining walls to help manage storm watc <br />stated that it would be staff's recommendation t <br />75' zone for 166 s.f. or 1.46% hardcover to allo <br />for a grassed lake access path. Staff also recomi <br />75 -250' zone to allow portions of an existing re <br />as proposed by Tom Kellogg. <br />Mr. Wambold stated that he was not in total agi <br />reducing the retaining wall to the 942', Wambo <br />erosion problems again in the 0 -75'. Above the <br />be removed without problem. Again, Wambolc <br />file with the city which would have flagged his <br />1379 PARK DRIVE — VARIANCE <br />tt the March 28"' City Council meeting to allow . <br />request to allow specific portions of the walls <br />also shown by the neighbor as an area requiring <br />drainage and facilitate erosion control. Curtis <br />at approval of a hardcover variance within the 0- <br />r portions of the existing retaining wall to remain <br />.ends approval of a hardcover variance within the <br />lining wall to remain to facilitate erosion control <br />;ement with the Engineer's conclusion. By <br />i contended that they are opening up the area to <br />►42' Wambold agreed the boulders and wall could <br />stated that as the new homeowner, nothing was on <br />ttention that there was a violation in the first place. <br />PAGE 3 of 10 <br />