Laserfiche WebLink
C] <br />• <br />U <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY dOUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, l 4arch 28, 2005 <br />7:00 o',clock p.m. <br />(8. #05 -3080 INTERSPACE WEST, 2060 W. AYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br />McMillan pointed out that once the land is <br />landscaping is the first phase of the develo <br />White moved, Murphy seconded, adopting <br />discussed regarding page 5, item 3, that a s <br />northerly portion of the western property 1 <br />for the property located at 2060 Wayzata I <br />5, Nays 0. <br />9. #05 -3085 JULANN, INC., 3455 <br />REVIEW <br />and the retaining walls constructed, the <br />amended RESOLUTION NO. 5296, as <br />ountable access shall be `researched' along the <br />idary, also granting Concept Plan Approval <br />;yard for Interspace -West, Inc. VOTE: Ayes <br />DRIVE — COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN <br />Gundlach explained that, based on the lack of on -site parking and the existing parking shortage of <br />2.5 stalls before the addition of the proposed use, the Planning Commission voted to deny the <br />request for a commercial site plan. The applicants have submitted a shared parking space license <br />agreement with the Keaveny property, as a means for acquiring additional parking. Gundlach <br />encouraged the Council to review the ingress and egress agreement currently existing for the site <br />and the shared parking space license agreement including the Keaveny amendment for access to <br />those spaces, and determine if the site will be negatively impacted by the introduction of this new <br />use. <br />In light of the serious parking deficiencies at the site, Murphy pointed out that the Planning <br />Commission held a long discussion regarding this application at its last meeting. <br />Sansevere stated that, if he was the applicant, i <br />the license agreement for any reason he would <br />whether the applicant fully understood the ram <br />would concern him that if the Keavenys terminate <br />►ave to vacate his place of business. He questioned <br />acations of this agreement to his/her business. <br />Murphy cautioned the Council that here they were once again examining the Navarre area, after <br />having just received a letter from the Planning Commission urging the Council to develop a plan or <br />set of standards for the Navarre area before allowing further piece -meal development. He stated <br />that he saw no reason not to grant approval to proceed, as long as the applicant understood the <br />implications of the license agreement. <br />Attorney Barrett renunded the Council that it is <br />they will willingly vacate the premises, than it <br />arise. He stated that the City should require the <br />lessees to this effect. <br />The owner of Liza Jane's Hair Design, 3445 <br />that the mall is already severely short on par <br />would be placed, up or down below. She voi <br />paying a premium for street frontage with lit <br />mall owner should be required to add additic <br />exist. <br />one thing for the applicants to state at this time that <br />for them to actually do so if the circumstances <br />rpplicants to write an occupancy permit with the <br />)reline Drive, stated that while maintaining the fact <br />;, she questioned where the additional 8 spaces <br />her concern that, as a street side business, she was <br />I parking as it was. She asked whether the strip <br />spaces up top, or at minimum stripe those that do <br />PAGE 7 of 14 <br />