My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
03-14-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:49:44 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:47:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #05 -3081 ZB Construction, Inc., Continued) • <br />Gaffron stated before the Council tonight is a resolution giving preliminary and final plat approval, <br />general development plan approval for PUD No. 4B, and PUD No. 4B Agreement and PUD/Development <br />Contract. Gaffron stated the City does require mylars prior to final plat approval, noting that the county <br />has not yet approved those. Gaffron further noted that release of this project would not happen until all <br />aspects of the project have been completed. <br />Gaffron noted the documents have been provided to the City Attorney for his review. <br />Barrett indicated he does have a few minor comments but that there are no substantial changes to the <br />documents. <br />McMillan inquired whether Staff feels there are any issues that the Council should discuss. <br />Gaffron stated individuals would be purchasing and owning separate units, with a common interest <br />community plat being developed that describes and creates the individual ownerships. Gaffron stated the <br />City is not involved in that aspect of this project. Gaffron noted there would also be bylaws and <br />covenants for this development, which the City would be reviewing. <br />McMillan recommended that potential purchasers be informed that there is a public works building <br />adjacent to this lot and that there is the possibility for noise. <br />Zachman indicated potential purchasers would be informed of that as well as the fact that there would be • <br />offices across the street. <br />McMillan inquired what type of lighting would be on the building. <br />Zachman stated they would be installing a 60 -watt bulb on each of the decks, a light over the entrance to <br />the garage and the fire doors, and a chandelier in the front entryway. <br />White inquired whether the deck lights would be downcast. <br />Zachman stated the lights would work off a switch and would be an exterior type light. <br />McMillan inquired whether any lighting along the sidewalk was being planned. <br />Zachman stated they have not discussed that. <br />McMillan suggested the applicant consider installing low voltage lighting along the sidewalk. <br />Zachman indicated he would be willing to incorporate the low voltage lighting along the sidewalk., <br />White suggested the applicant consider utilizing 15 -watt bulbs rather than 60 -watt bulbs on the decks. <br />Zachman stated they do currently utilize 15 -watt bulbs in the hallways. <br />• <br />PAGE 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.