My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
02-28-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:49:35 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:46:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 28, 2005 <br />7:00 o (clock p.m. <br />(5.#04-3052 ERIC vOGSTROM, 2618 CASCO POINT ROAD, Contiir.cced) <br />I <br />Vogstrom maintained that, had he gone through the proper channels to obtain permission, some of <br />the trees would have been allowed to be removed in the first place. <br />Although not within the Ordinance, Attorney Barrett stated that the Council has granted variance <br />requests based on trees in the past if they choose to do so once again. <br />Murphy stated that he had consistently voted no to this application, and would do so again. He was <br />concerned that the footprint of the proposed house was too much for the lot, pointing out that the <br />1500 s.f. footprint is not an entitlement but a lirnit. He believed that a footprint of 1250 s.f. was <br />more appropriate. Murphy stated that he would Cbe inclined to grant the variance to save the tree, <br />only because the neighbor supported it and he was the one most adversely impacted by the <br />applicant's actions. <br />I <br />Vogstrom asked why he did not warrant 1500 slf. <br />i <br />Gaffron stated that lots less than 10,000 s.f are allowed up to a 1500 s.f. footprint; however, it is an <br />allowance, which an applicant is not entitled to if it adversely impacts hardcover. <br />Moorse pointed out that there are numerous examples of new construction that do not have a 1500 <br />s.f. footprint due to hardcover limitations. <br />McMillan stated that she was satisfied with the work that staff had done and with their <br />• recommendation. She indicated that the City hats Ordinances in place for a reason and that the City <br />should maintain its right of way, as many of its right of ways have been severely encroached upon. <br />She stated that she would hold firm on staffs recommendation. <br />White concurred, pointing out that if the applicant were given a variance, there was no guarantee <br />that the tree would survive anyway; therefore, lie was not willing to support the variance. <br />White moved, McMillan seconded, to approve staffs report and adopt RESOLUTION NO. <br />5286 as presented. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2. 1 <br />Mayor Peterson and Murphy dissenting, positions noted above. Murphy added that he found it <br />troublesome that the City may be viewed as deeming that trees are not worth saving. <br />6. #05 -3072 ORONO SCHOOLS, 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH — <br />VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />Mayor Peterson moved, Murphy seconded, to table Application #05 -3072, Orono Schools, to <br />provide an opportunity for staff to clarify the resolution. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*7. #05 -3079 NICOLE AND PETER THOMAS, 1385 ORONO LANE — VARIANCES — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5287 11 <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5287, A Resolution <br />approving a hardcover variance for the 0 -75, zo ne and also a lake setback variance to permit <br />• construction of a wrought iron deck within 7I 5' of the lake. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />I <br />PAGE 3 of 10 <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.