02-14-2005 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • • i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, February 14, 2005 7:00 o'clock p.m. ( #05 -3072 Orono Schools) Murphy commented it is not the Council's purview draft a resolution approving the monument sign wit not be constructed until the spring, which would gii determine exactly how the sponsor panel would loo Fritzler stated the Planning Commission was under used to denote the chief sponsor of the sign and thai monthly or other basis, which would tend to make t design signs and that the motion directs Staff to the sponsor panel. Murphy noted this sign would the school district time to work with Staff and also he impression that the sponsor panel would only be the sponsor panel would not be changed on a sign more commercial. Sansevere stated in his view there should be a plaque in addition to the sponsor panel. Sansevere stated in his opinion the school should have the opportunity to use the sponsor panel to help raise funds for various school projects. f White stated in his view the sign would not be I exercised good judgment in the past on what to Gaffron noted the motion is in favor of the sign as other conditions being imposed on the sponsor pai Murphy suggested the City be given the right of VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 5, N 6. #05 -3079 NICOLE AND PETER 'I Peter Thomas, Applicant, and Jim Meister, visible from Highway 12 and that the school has y on the existing sign. 0. with the sponsor panel remaining, and no ve review if changes are made to the sign. 1385 ORONO LANE — VARIANCE were present. Gundlach stated the applicants are requesting variances in order to construct a 8' x 11' landing/deck above the existing mechanical equipment on the lakeside on the home. The property is located at 1385 Orono Lane, with shoreline on two sides of the lot. Gundlach noted a hardcover variance is required to permit 10.79 percent hardcover within the 0 -75' lake setback zone when 0 percent is allowed and 10.79 percent currently exists. The applicants have proposed removal of 100 square feet of driveway within the 0 -75' zone to offset the proposed deck. Staff found the proposal reasonable as the applicant is not proposing to increase the total amount of hardcover within the 0 -75' setback zone and the hardships found under the 2001 hardcover variance remain unchanged. The Planning Commission had a tie vote of 3 -3 on a�motion to deny the request. The Commissioners who voted to deny the variances felt that approval of a trade of non - structural hardcover for structural PAGE 11