My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-2005 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
01-10-2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 3:49:08 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:45:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n <br />U <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 10, 2005 <br />7:00 o' lock p.m. <br />( #04 -3016 Wayzata Design and Development, <br />Gaffron stated the applicants received preliminary �lat approval in July. Gaffron noted final plans <br />responding to the City Engineer's recent comments have been submitted. The City has received letters <br />from two neighboring property owners expressing concerns with this application. <br />Gaffron stated the applicants are proposing a severi1 lot Planned Residential Development, with the <br />applicant having made the appropriate revisions to the preliminary plat drawing to show the areas to be <br />protected via a conservation easement. The side setbacks for all lots have also been revised to 30 feet to <br />ensure a minimum of 60' separation between principal structures. Existing trees within the conservation <br />easement areas will be preserved, with the applicant having agreed to walk the site with staff prior to site <br />grading to establish which, if any, trees within the grading area can be saved or transplanted. Gaffron <br />stated the applicant is proposing to plant trees every' 40 feet along the private road as required by City <br />Code and is also proposing additional trees west of lots 1 and 2 in an attempt to begin re- establishment of <br />the vegetated buffer in this area. <br />Gaffron stated Staff is also recommending pruning, of trees and removal of dead wood and damaged <br />branches within the Conservation Easement, with the Homeowners Association being in charge of this <br />area following construction of the development. Gaffron requested the Council discuss the need for <br />establishing a fund or funding mechanism to help maintain this area in the future by the Homeowners <br />Association. The easement will also include a wood chip path, with the existing bridge in need of <br />replacement, subject to permits by the appropriate agencies. <br />Gaffron stated the private road accessing this dev <br />foot northerly corridor. Gaffron stated the applic <br />runoff to the NURP pond, curb and gutter is requ <br />addition, the grading plan indicates that the buildi <br />the home is designed. Gaffron noted it is likely tl <br />what was originally proposed given the proposed <br />the visibility of the residences. <br />pment has been redesigned to be centered on the 40- <br />has concluded in order to achieve the desired water <br />1 along the entire length of the private road. In <br />pads for all seven lots will be graded in at the time <br />the elevation of the seven homes will be lower than <br />vation of the cul -de -sac, which would help to reduce <br />Gaffron stated in regards to stormwater management, preliminary plat approval was granted for seven lots <br />predicated on the applicants' assertion that the site! contains at least 14 acres of non - wetland area and that <br />the MCWD had accepted the wetland delineation based on the provided delineation report and the <br />findings of the TEP panel. The final plat submitted depicts a 40' by 470' corridor that was not shown as <br />wetland on any preliminary plat drawings and also was not depicted on any wetland delineation report <br />provided to the City. The applicant has indicated they are in the process of filing the required <br />-wetland/buffer easements with Hennepin County to meet MCWD requirements. Gaffron noted no <br />provisions have been specified in the covenants for maintenance of the stormwater ponds. <br />Gappa stated to his understanding in the City's previous subdivisions the homeowners associations have <br />been responsible for maintaining the NURP ponds. <br />Gaffron indicated that language would need to be I dded to the covenant agreements. <br />Gaffron indicated there are a number of issues Staff has regarding the developers agreement. The <br />applicant is proposing to begin construction of a new home on Lot 3, which replaces the existing house, <br />'AGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.