Laserfiche WebLink
' MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 10, 2005 <br />7:00 o'jclock p.m. <br />• ( #04 -3052 Eric Vogstrom, Continued) <br />Essen stated the upper deck would probably not be'used for parties, but that in his view twisting the house <br />has now given the applicant a clear view to his residence. <br />i <br />White inquired whether the house could be rotated slightly. <br />Vogstrom stated he would prefer to look at the lake and not his neighbor's house and that he will attempt <br />to re -orient the house slightly to help preseve his r neighbor's privacy. Vogstrom stated he did locate the <br />garage on that lot to take advantage of the best view of the lake. Vogstrom indicated he also would like to <br />preserve his privacy. <br />White inquired how far off the lot line the Essen <br />Jeff Essen stated their house is located approxii <br />he also has been in favor of a variance on the h <br />closer to his.property line and is larger than the <br />runoff. <br />is located. <br />20 or 25 feet from the property line. Essen stated <br />-r, but the fact that the house is proposed 15 feet <br />t stiucture is the basis for his concerns regarding <br />McMillan inquired whether the City has received at grading plan on this project. <br />Gaffron stated the City has not received anything that could be considered a final grading plan and that it <br />would be required at the time the building permit is applied for. Gaffron indicated the Council could <br />• <br />require specific items relating to drainage. <br />Vogstrom stated he did agree to the downspouts and gutters and that Essen has agreed to replace the <br />shrubs and bushes in between the two homes to help with the privacy. Vogstrom indicated he would not <br />be opposed to those two items being included in the development agreement. <br />White moved to direct Staff to prepare a resolution to. accept the current revised plan submitted as <br />part of Application #04 -3052, 2618 Casco Point Road, and to bring the resolution back for approval <br />on January 24, 2005, with the inclusion of a requirement for the installation. of down spouts and <br />grading plan. <br />• <br />Moorse recommended at the time the Council approves the resolution on the 240', a signed agreement <br />should be in place for the tree replacement. <br />White amended his motion to include the <br />to the City concerning the tree replaceme <br />Nays 0. <br />indition that a signed agreement be submitted <br />plan. McMillan seconded. VOTE: Ayes 3, <br />PAGE 11 <br />