Laserfiche WebLink
, #06-3225 375 Wa}�zat� Boulevard <br /> August 17,2006 <br /> P�ge 2 <br /> Applicltion Si�tus ' . <br /> Tlie applic�uli: subniitted ihe application ai�,d applicatioiz fees on July 24, �L1TStic�llt 'L'0 COLll1C1I's <br /> • �: � July 10 ac�ion to direct star�' to draf�; lang�.iabe to ameiid ihe 2000-2020 Orono C011lllltilll�:y <br /> '� � � Ma��agement.Plaii (Conzprellensive Plan, 'aka CMP). That 1inguage has been dra!'ted aild is <br /> � 1ti:ached as E�hibit F. IIowever, tlie CNIP �uiendment could noi Ue coildition111y approved by <br /> ' filie CoLUlcil ou Aub isi 14 due i;o oi�ly 3 coLUZCilnieinbers being present (Coinp Plau�amendnients � <br /> ' � . require a 2/3 vote of all couilcilinembers, i.e. 67% or 4/5). <br /> ' Couiicil is expected to ilke foiznal action to coilditionally aclopt the Ameiidmeilt on August 28 <br /> and d'u•ect staff to forward it to mei Couilcil for al�l�roval. It could take some tiiiie for Met <br /> � � . � Council approval. We also nnlst accoluit for the 60-day conulleiit period afforded adjoiiuiig <br /> � jurisdictions a.i1d potentially affected ageilcies (iil tlus case, cities of Loug Lake aizd Wayzafia, <br /> A�iz.DOT, MiiDNR, Hennepuz DOT, Tluee Rivers Parks, Oroi�o Schools, MCWD, etc.). We do � <br /> �. � not luZOw what other related or unrelated requueinents Met Couilcil may want to iiilpose. For <br /> �uistaiice, t118y Illlaht not approve tlie amendment until a fonnal sewer and water agieeiilent witli <br /> Loiig Lake for tlus pro�erty is iii place. � <br /> ' It is staff's conclusion that tlie a�plication is preniati.ue, and ihat il�e fonnal review period should <br /> , iiot conuneiice tmtil the Comp Plan 1�illeiidnle�t is ui place. . � <br /> . � �In the meaxituue, staff is bringing this ap�licatioii forward to Plamun� C011]I111SSi0ll fU11Ct1011al1y . <br /> as a concept plan to allow an oppoi-tuiuty to identify�otential conceins, issues, a�.id developnient . . <br /> parameters that applicant should address. . �. <br /> Park Cominisszon Review � � <br /> Park Couulussiou was asked to illake a recoiluzieildatioil to Council as to wlietlier dedication of � � ' <br /> laiid or easeineilts should be required, or merely collect7on of a park fee. Park Coizu�lissioii . <br /> Cllair I�ene Silber lias indicated tlze Park Conuuission discussed tlus a�plication dui7ng tlieu tour � <br /> of Big IS1311C1 011 ALlbllS� 7 311d 15 T�C011ll11811d111g tilclt 110 la.11d. C10C�1Ca.t1011 1S ll6CeSS8TY, aiid that a <br /> Park Fee sliould be required. � <br /> - � Deveiopment Parametez�s pet•Draft CMP Amendzxient <br /> - The drafl: CMP amendnlent is iniended to apply to just tlle applicanfi's �roperty a.nd no others. . <br /> . Tlle ame��dnleiZt iiofes t111t in additioii 1:o tlle pernutted, conditional and accessory uses allowed <br /> wiiluiZ ihe RR-1B zoning districi, this a.mei�.dnient allows :Cor resideiltial developnzei�.t of the � �. <br /> �property a1:a dez7sity oF 1 uiut per 0.70 dry buildable acres (1.43 uiuts per acre). It then goes oii to <br /> esiablish pa�ailleters for any residential developillent of t11e propeifiy at a density �eater thaai 0.5 � <br /> uiuts per acre of dry buildaUle l�uld. T11ose iilclude: � <br /> 1. Such develolnlzeilt shall be subject i;o tlie PUD development proccss, atZd shall be rezoned <br /> to IZPUD Residential Pl�uuled Unit Developineiit. The entire�roperty sh111 be developed <br /> as a siiigle PUD project. � <br />