My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:23:19 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:15:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
540
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, • <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> • Monday,March 19,2007 • <br /> . 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> . (#07-3271 Judson Dayton,Continued) <br /> . As proposed,Lots 1, 3 and 4 do not meet these standards. If Outlots A and B were increased to 50 feet <br /> minimum width,it might be reasonable to consider that these three lots abut an acceptable private road. <br /> It may be worth of discussion as to whether merely creating the conforming private road corridor,but <br /> not building the road,would be sufficient to eliminate the back lot issue. An area of concern is where <br /> Outlot A goes past the horse barn. <br /> In 2006,Hennepin County Transportation Department indicated that this property should be limited to <br /> one access onto County Road 84. The fact that this property is being subdivided iriggers review by the <br /> County,and although two driveways exist,the county may have the right to limit their increased use for <br /> additional lots. <br /> Orono's Comprehensive Trail System Plan indicates that a trail easement from the Luce Line Trail to . <br /> Norenberg Park along Old Crystal Bay Road is planned for the future. Whether this trail will go on the <br /> east side or the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road has not been determined. Other than a trail easement, <br /> no other park needs are identified in this area, and the property would be subject to the standard park fee <br /> for two or three new lots, giving credit for the existing home on proposed Lot 2. <br /> ` Hennepin County has requested an additional 17 feet of right-of-way along Old Crystal Bay Road for, <br /> among other uses,trail puYposes. The City Council will be asked to consider whether a trail easement <br /> andJor expansion of right-of-way along the east boundary of the property are required. <br /> The City Engineer has suggested that the standard drainage and utility easements will be required along <br /> all lot lines, and the appropriate easements be provided over all wetlands and drainageways. Staff <br /> � would expect a more thorough drainage review will ultimately be required, and potentially the need for <br /> ce�tain stormwater management systems. The property will be subject to the standard storm water and <br /> drainage trunk fee. <br /> The property is within the MUSA but does not have municipal sewer directly available at this time. A <br /> sewer force main serving the adjacent Farview neighborhood is expected to be constructed in 2007 and <br /> will be located in the OCB road right-of-way at the east end of the property. It would be the City's <br /> preference that these new lots are provided with inunicipal sewer. There is the potential that the <br /> Metropolitan Council may not look kindly at providing sewer service to low density areas of less than <br /> three units per acre. In the event that the developer cannot connect to municipal sewer, each new lot <br /> must demonstrate the capability for two 5-bedroom capacity septic systems. <br /> Gaffron stated hardcover is not expected to be an issue for the proposed lots as each lot is allowed <br /> approximately 7,500 square feet of hardcover allowance in the 75-250 foot zone. Structural lot <br /> coverage limits do not apply, as each lot exceeds two acres. . <br /> Average lakeshore setback has the potential to become an issue for Lots 1, 3,and 4. The existing home <br /> • on Lot 2 is about 175 feet from the lake. The existing lakeshore residence in Little Orchard directly east <br /> of Lot 4 is also about 175 feet from the shore. It follows that the homes on Lots 3 and 4 should also be <br /> 175 feet from the shore. This requirement could be established as part of the subdivision approvals, <br /> which would avoid concerns about floating average setbacks. The average setback for Lot 1 would be <br /> PAGE 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.