Laserfiche WebLink
. . � <br /> • ' � � <br /> �„ <br /> • ����� �� <br /> ,y y�`"�'..� <br /> A RESOL�J'ryON]Et]ESCINJDING � <br /> � � . � AMENJDN�EN'T #2 O]F TIEIE <br /> � 2000-2020 CT'TY OF OROI�tO <br /> � COlYIMUNITY lYIANAGENlEN'T PLAN <br /> . � . � R]EGARDyNG STONEBAY OUTLOT A <br /> � WHEJE3�AS, the City of Orono is a municipal coiporation located within <br /> . Hennepin County and witlun the planning jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council; and � <br /> . VV�i$E�AS, in accordance with tl�e Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976 ai�.d <br /> its atnendn�ents, and with Minnesota Statutes Chapters 462 and 473, the City of Orono in • <br /> � November 2001 adopted a comprehensive municipal plan known as the 2000-2020 City of . . � .� <br /> Oiono Community MaL�agement Plan (also referred to as the 2000-2020 CMP) to provide for the � �. <br /> • � : orderly development of the City. An integral element of the 2000-2020 CMP is the Land Use . � � <br /> Plan which�establislies allowed uses for propei�ty withiii the City; and . <br /> � � Vi��RIEAS, on June 14, 2004 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5190 <br /> which approved Aniendment#2 of the 2000-2020 CMP;and . <br /> VV1�R�a�, Amendment #2 amended ihe Land Use P1u1 eleinent of the 2000- , <br /> � 2020 CMP by revisulg and adding to the text within the section entitled Urban Commercial Land <br /> ' Use, which text additions specifically provided a basis a�id parameters for expansion of the retail . .. <br /> � � uses allowable within Outlot A, Stonebay. The ainendment re-guided Outlot A fronl primarily � <br /> commercial office use, to additionally allow primarily commercial retail use of the site. Tlie . '. ' <br /> ' amendment additionally adopted a revised CMP Map 3B-7, indicai:ing the noted revisions; and <br /> � . . � . W�YEREAS, the City Council now finds that the basis established in 2004 via <br /> � � Resolution No. 5190 for suppoi�ting the primarily retail use of Outlot A, Stonebay is no longer <br /> � � valid, and finds that the parameters established in Amendment #2 should no�longer be in place; � � <br /> and _ � � �� <br /> � � �VHEIt�AS, in September 2006 the City Council directed City staff to iiiitiate an � <br /> � amendment of the CMP to rescind Ci�IP Amendment#2; and � <br /> . � �,�1��R�',AS, pursuant to published and mailed legal notice to the affected and <br /> • adjoinin; property owners, on November 20, 2006, January 16, 2007 and March 19, 2007 ihe <br /> Orono Plannin; Commission held public hearings regardin� the proposed CMP amendment, at <br /> which times all parties wishing to speak re;arding this iizatter��ere heard; and <br /> . Page 1 of 2 <br />