My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:23:19 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:15:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
540
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
" ' " FILE#07-3262 <br /> � ' .. 15 February 2007 <br /> ' . Page 5 of 5 <br /> considered with this application? � <br /> � • Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recognizes that a 50' buffer would essentially take up all of the usable yard on the <br /> property and some of the existing home, however it would not be unreasonable to <br /> compromise and create a buffer of some type on this property. Staff recommends that <br /> John Smyth of Bonestroo be allowed to review and comment on the applicants' plans. <br /> While Planning Staff recommends approval of a some level of hardcover variances in � <br /> conjunction'with this project, the levels requested may not be reasonable. Planning <br /> Commission should discuss the additional requirement of the lake setback on the eastern <br /> portions of the lot and whether or not the hardcover as requested is reasonable. <br /> If the Planning Coinmission feels that there is hardslup with respect to the location of the <br /> existing home and it is a reasonable request of the applicants' to preserve the personal <br /> historical value of the existing �home staff will support some level of hardcover and <br /> setback variances to allow additions. Additionally, staff will not support a height variaizce <br /> and staff would recommend the applicants submit revised plans reflecting the third level <br /> as a half-story as allowed. The applicants should be required to address all of the City's <br /> engineering concerns in Tom Kellogg's letter(Exhibit F), <br /> • . � <br /> �. <br />.,.<, . � . , � , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.