My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
04-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 4:23:19 PM
Creation date
7/24/2012 4:15:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
540
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' 1 I r. . . . . . . <br /> .. . . ��.���� --_=- �_ <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> • ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION °�' <br /> ��� � <br /> Tuesday,February 20, 2007 �,� ��" w� s � <br /> , � � ; <br /> G:QO o'clock p.m. ' � _� �-• ;�''�`� <br /> 7, #07-3259 LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS FOR GA.RY AND KA.THRY�T GANGSTEE, � <br /> 1374 REST POINT ROAD,VARIA.NCE,7:30 -8:13 P.M.. <br /> Peter Jacobson ancl Ryail 5molil:on behalf of Lake Country Builders were present. . <br /> Gaffi�on stated the applicants are cequestin�certain variances to allo�v rriodification aiid e�pansion of <br /> � the existinQ house aild �a►•a�e,includin�rernovat of the wing of the house closest to the street, a <br /> 40 snuare foot addition to the house, reconstruction and expansion of the second story of the house, . <br /> tlie addition of dori»ers to the garaje roof and construction of a trvo-story link bet�veen the house and <br /> �arage, The variances bein,requested include the followina: <br /> l. Street setback for the house of 18 feet�vhere a 1?-foot setback cu�rently e�ists and a 30-foot <br /> setbac(t is required. <br /> � 2. Maintaiu a side setback for the e;cistin;garage of 9.1 feet when a 10-foot setback is required. � . <br /> 3. To have 29.8 percent 1lardcover in tlie 75-250 foot zoile�rhen 25 percent is allowed and 30.3 � <br /> percent c«rrently e�ists and to allotiv the 0-75 foot zoile to remain with 9.0 �ercent hardcover. <br /> The applica�its are proposin;t11is as a remodel, not a rebuild. One af their goals is to be able to retai�i <br /> the 11o�loot�fo['mi�1g p�ol �vhich is partially�vithin the 0-7� foot�one and contributes to excess � ' <br /> � hardcover on the site. � � <br /> Staff recoinmends the Plannin�-Commission table this application aftec pi•ovidin�the applicants with � . <br /> direction reQardina the follo�vin� issues: . . � <br /> l. �Vhether tllis sllould be considered a total reb�iild; <br /> ?, Whether there is justification based on tl�e extent of tlle project to require a confonnin; 30- � � <br /> foot street sztback instead of allo�vin�a second story at the t S-foot setbacl:; . <br /> ;. �\•'hether the applicants shc�uld be Qranted a hardcover variance to be a(lo���ed to keep the pool. <br /> • o;:,'"; ��;�r ;r i� ;i��ii�_niirprin;iia 1[�:� �:ll�'i11�v Il� 1'I12 �1-%] tOOC L0112. 311d iI13I lC l� i�l�� Dfl11131V Cc'3S011 fOC . <br /> �XC?S� �18fdC0\"ti'QI? t�lz SlC2; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.