Laserfiche WebLink
, � <br /> Wetland 1 was described as a TSPe 1L-PF01B,and Type 3 PEIVI/SS IF wetlandcomplex:`Wetland 1 <br /> is:doininated b}�reed:canary grass{Phalm-is arundinacea),giant aoldenrod(Solidago gigafitea);red <br /> maple(ac�r resbrestn)and pussy willow(salix discolor).The soil contained a histic epipedon with a � <br /> semi-restrictive�clay layer at 9 inches below the ground surface.The soil was saturated to the surface . � � <br /> within the depressional area and tested positive when fhe FAC-Neutral test was applied. <br /> The adjacent upland was dominated by reed canar.y grass and �Ganada goldenrad (Solidago <br /> canadefasis). The soil contairied a tHick dark surface.and was depleted below 1.7 inches identifying <br /> tlus so�l hydric,but no indicators of hydrology existed even tliough the rainfall amount just prior to <br /> the site visit was over 3 inches above average. <br /> . Area.A was originallyinvestigated due to the dominance of reed canary grass and a willow species . <br /> (Shcix spP,)along wi.th the presence of standing water.After further investigaCion zt appeared that the <br /> area had been hydrologically altered because there were a number of PVC pipes and corrugated <br /> plastic pipes gresent fhat appeared ta have:discharged wafer.SER personnel did notcollect soil data. <br /> within Area A due to the�possibility that underground pipes ma}J be damaged.Area A was therefore <br /> _ . identified as:a questionable area. � <br /> �����5���� <br /> SER completed ali on-site deTineations based on the three required technical criteria as outlined b,y <br /> the 1987.Manual: the presence of hydric soils, a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and <br /> indicators of wetland hydrology in eaah basin_The site visit porfion:of the wetland delineation was <br /> . completed on October 2, ?007. <br /> �.� SER personnel:examined the subjeet praperty forareas.ineeting jurisdictional weCland criteria during <br /> the site visit and delineated the edge of one basin as being jurisdictional wetland and iden�ifieel one � <br /> area as being jurisdictionally guestionable(Figure.5). Detailed soils,vegetation and hydrology da�a <br /> for the wetland area is provided ip the data sheets of The Technical Doc.umentation.Section. A�set of <br /> full-scale f gures is given in the Figures Section. . <br /> � �C����+������� <br /> Activities which impact or potentially.impacC wetlands aaze currently re;ulated aC several levels of <br /> government. In Minnesota,the two primary jurisdictions are covered at the state and federal levels <br /> by the pro��isions of the following legislative acfions. <br /> � State jurisdiction by the Wetland Gonservation Act.of 1.991. (WCA) administered <br /> . � by tne WCA Local Cro.vernmental Unit (LGrU). <br /> � Federal jurisdiction by the Clean V�ater Act of 1972 and subsequent amendments. <br /> SvobodaEcological Resources 80 Wear Lane <br /> Project No.:2007-80-03 10 Gary Desantis <br />