My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
11-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:28:14 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 4:28:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. i . <br /> Because varied enclosure is a combination of the enclosures discussed in Case Studies <br /> #1, #2, and #3, impacts from development on varied enclosure are similar to those <br /> discussed above. In particulaz, areas of open enclosure may provide unwanted views of <br /> new residential and industrial/commercial land uses. Other areas, where the enclosure is <br /> edged or tunneled, may suffer from degradation of vegetation quality. To mitigate such � <br /> threats, varied enclosure requires the combination of standards to require the screening <br /> of non-rural uses where necessary and preserve and enhance roadside vegetation. <br /> • Corridor Study Conclusions . .. . - _ . . . <br /> Analyzing the characteristics of 10 corridors allowed the consultants to determine the <br /> essential attributes and potential threats to the rural character in the City of Orono. A <br /> general assessment of the Corridor Study revealed that views from the road, types of <br /> roadside development, and corridor enclosure are the most important factors in <br /> determining the rural character of a corridor. Through this process, threats to rural <br /> character (specifically to enclosure) were identified. These threats (discussed in Case <br /> Studies#1 -#4) include: : <br /> • Views of"non-rural"land uses: (i.e. new residential, industrial, commercial). <br /> • Degradation of natural viewsheds. <br /> • Low quality roadside vegetation. , _ <br /> • Removal of vegetative buffers and roadside vegetation. <br /> The Corridor Study also provided initial mitigation strategies to counteract the effects of <br /> the above threats and to promote the objectives of Goal #2, the preservation of the city's <br /> ntral character. These remedies include: � <br /> • Preservation/enhancement of riatural viewsheds. <br /> � Screening of non-rural land uses. <br /> • Land use controls to ensure development placement or screening. <br /> • Corridor guidelines to preserve and enhance vegetation. <br /> • Preservation/enhancement of vegetative buffers. <br /> • Corridor guidelines to ensure that adjacent development preserves key buffers. <br /> Development Site Analysis and Concept Site Design <br /> To promote development that will fulfill both Goals #1 and #2 by retaining and <br /> improving the rural and environmental identity of Orono, it is�important to assess <br /> potential development in an aesthetic and ecological context. The Corridor Study <br /> established a surveying technique for aesthetic resources in the community, particularly <br /> in regards to rural character. Next, it was important to incorporate ecological factors <br /> related to the environmental health of the community into the analysis. A comprehensive <br /> City of Orono DSU, Inc <br /> Draft CPA 12 August, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.